Showing posts with label
access to documents
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
access to documents
.
Show all posts
Thursday, May 02, 2019
Ausschluss von Vergabeverfahren: Gleiss-Mandantin Daimler und andere Kartellanten unter Druck
Juve.de,
hier
.
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Landmark judgements of Swiss Courts on the protection of business secrets and access to files in cartel cases
M. Meinhardt, F. Bremer,
here
.
Monday, June 15, 2015
Relationship Between Public and Private Antitrust Enforcement
OECD, Note by the Secretariat,
here
.
Tuesday, September 09, 2014
MasterCard Wins Court Fight With EU Over Card-Fee Study
Bloomberg,
here.
Ruling
here.
Monday, October 07, 2013
A Need to Know Basis: The European Commission’s Approach to Sharing Information Concerning Article 101 TFEU Infringements
Steptoe.com,
here
.
Friday, June 07, 2013
Vollständiger Ausschluss der Akteneinsicht (auch gegenüber dem Kronzeugen) verstößt gegen EU-Recht
L. Maritzen,
hier
(Kartellblog.de).
Thursday, June 06, 2013
CJEU on action for damages and access to the file
Case C‑536/11, Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Donau Chemie AG et al.,
here
.
Thursday, February 07, 2013
AG Jääskinen on access to court files of public law competition proceedings
Case C‑536/11,
here
.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Entscheidung des Amtsgerichts Bonn in Sachen Pfleiderer
AG Bonn vom 18. Januar 2012,
hier
. Mittelung des Bundeskartellamtes
hier
.
Thursday, December 15, 2011
EU General Court on Access to Documents in Competition Cases
Case T-437/08, CDC Hydrogene Peroxide Cartel Damage Claims (CDC Hydrogene Peroxide) v
European Commission,
here
. For a first take on (and background to) this ruling read
@kartellblog
..
Older Posts
Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Guelphs and Ghibellines, 102 Brussels Edition (a View from the Digital Ciompi)
Not Tagliacozzo, but Florence (IBA Annual Conference) The Guelphs : the less conservative academics defending the Commission’s 102 Guidelin...
How to Fix a Failing Art. 102 TFEU: Substantive Interpretation, Evidentiary Requirements, and the Commission's Future Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses
H. Schweitzer, S. de Ridder, here (and here ).
"German" Apple ATTF
Here .
Study on the impact of mergers reviewed by the Commission on innovation and markups
EC, here.
GC confirms: Edge not a DMA gatekeeper (?)
GC, here .
CASE DMA.100193 - Alphabet - Online Search Engine - Google Search - Art. 6(5)
Here .
Guidelines on the application of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings
EC, here . Useful here.
‘Digital Public Infrastructure’: Cultural hegemony and states’ technological dependence
C. Rikap, here.
Agentic AI: Technical Developments, Potential Impact on Consumers and Markets, and Regulatory Implications
B. Jansen et al., here .
Economic study on dynamic effects of mergers
EC, here.
.jpg)
Not Tagliacozzo, but Florence (IBA Annual Conference) The Guelphs : the less conservative academics defending the Commission’s 102 Guidelin...