Monday, December 01, 2014
Who pays for us to browse the web? Be wary of Google’s latest answer
E. Morozov,
here
.
ACM’s strategy regarding enforcement of vertical restraints
C. Fonteijn,
here.
Star Witness in Apple Lawsuit Is Steve Jobs
NYTimes,
here.
Original Complaint (2005)
here
. Original Motion to Dismiss
here
.
Priceline maintains focus on reducing friction for local experiences, no plans to become the next Oracle
Tnooz.com,
here.
The Tempting Of Antitrust: Robert Bork and the Goals of Antitrust Policy
D. Crane,
here
.
Out of control? Robert Bork’s portrayal of the U.S. Antitrust system in the 1970s
W. Kovacic,
here
.
Robert Bork’s Forgotten Role in the Transaction Cost Revolution
A. Meese,
here
.
Bork and Microsoft: Why Bork Was Right and What We Learn About Judging Exclusionary Behavior
H. First,
here
.
Newer Posts
Older Posts
Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Providing Open Source with Access Rights to Proprietary Platforms via Interoperability Regulation
L. Lasota, here.
Paramount/Warner Bros Discovery
CMA: nothing to see here, here.
US antitrust is not entirely dead: a coalition of progressive academics has filed an amicus brief in Google Search, which is about as close as legal academia gets to storming the barricades
Here . More briefs here , here and here.
Google Search Data Sharing - Does Competition Law trump Privacy?
monopoly report, here.
"Le pouvoir d’intermédiation devient un pouvoir cognitif"
Le Monde, ici.
Vivaldi: DMA Article 6(7) request to access the WebAPK Minting API
Good luck, here.
Another day, another CAT certification
Here.
Digital sewer socialism
C. Doctorow, here.
Antitrust as Anti-Oligarch Policy
S. Vaheesan, here.
Judge halts Paramount’s $111B purchase of Warner Bros. in win for US states
ArsTechnica, here.
