One year post-Bilski: How the decision is being interpreted by the BPAI, District Courts, and Federal Circuit

R. Greene Sterne and M. Holoubek, here.

IP and Antitrust: Reformation and Harm

C. Bohannan, H. Hovenkamp, here. 

Red Hat's reading of Bilski submitted to the US PTO

Here.

Software Patents Post Bilski: A Look Ahead

Michael A. Spiegel, here.

Bilski Guidance?

USPTO's Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in view of Bilski v. Kappos.

A non-supportive video on software patents

Patent Absurdity, with reference to Bilski

On the limits of patent protection

Patent on diagnostic testing for genetic susceptibility to the most common hereditary forms of breast and ovarian cancer held invalid.

Oral argument in In Re Bilski before the US Supreme Court

See the transcript. Justice Breyer posed a slightly provoking question: "You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things --
(Laughter.)
JUSTICE BREYER: It was fabulous. And I could probably have reduced it to a set of steps and other teachers could have followed it. That you are going to say is patentable, too?
MR. JAKES: Potentially".

More Bilski Briefs

Listed by Groklaw

The Free Software Foundation on Bilski

An amicus brief has been filed.

The US Goverment's position on Bilski

A suggestion that software should be left substantially patentable? S. also Groklaw's post.