WorldIPReview, here.
Showing posts with label trade mark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trade mark. Show all posts
Saturday, October 05, 2019
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Saturday, October 15, 2016
Monday, May 16, 2016
Thursday, November 12, 2015
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Friday, August 29, 2014
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Friday, October 28, 2011
Friday, March 11, 2011
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Friday, October 29, 2010
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
"Vorsprung durch Technik"
The Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-398/08 P , Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, on the distinctive character of a trade mark.
Thursday, October 01, 2009
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
The Court of First Instance on the distinctive character of a mark
Smiley: decorative function, not a distinctive sign, Case T‑139/08, The Smiley Company SPRL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Advocate General on AdWords and Trademarks
Cases C-236 to 238/08 Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Video here . Thank you for asking, Robin. This is my short answer but happy to discuss it further. Concerning the very few words I loved ...
-
Disclosure : for 7 months covering Maria Luisa (Isa) Stasi’s leave, I had the honour of working with Article 19 and contributed to a civil s...
-
From LinkedIn, here . "Die Stiftung Marktwirtschaft gedenkt heute an die vor einem Jahr verstorbene Wettbewerbsjuristin Heike Sc...
-
From the DMA Team, on the only platform (US, ça va sans dire) they really feel at ease, apparently: here. My answer to the riddle: "E...
-
Obviously, I don’t have the answer. If you're waiting for antitrust to step in (is it exploitative behaviour? bundling? is there ...
-
EDPS, Video here. I’ve watched almost all of it, but in terms of substance it was rather thin. Von der Leyen I's data economy strate...
-
Re:publica 25, hier.