Thursday, March 30, 2023

Monday, March 27, 2023

Microsoft’s Battle with AI Companies: Data Restrictions Loom Over Rival Search Engines

 BigTechWire, here

Commission announces Guidelines on exclusionary abuses and amends Guidance on enforcement priorities

 EC, here

IS CREDIT SCORING AN AUTOMATED DECISION? – THE OPINION OF THE AG PIKAMÄE IN THE CASE C-634/21

 Digital Constitutionalist, here

The Age of AI has begun

 B. Gates, here.

Compare with B. Gates, The Internet Tidal Wave (1995), here

The Metaverse: Surveillant Physics, Virtual Realist Governance, and the Missing Commons

 A. McStay, here

Spinning Amazon’s Flywheel: How Amazon's business model harms competition -- A view from Europe

 Geradin Partners, here

CMA narrows scope of concerns in Microsoft – Activision review

 CMA, here

Is the Effects-Based Approach Too Cumbersome?: Taking Stock of Recent Practice and Case Law on Article 102 TFEU

 F. Castillo de la Torre, here

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

Right to repair: Commission introduces new consumer rights for easy and attractive repairs

 EC, here

Consumer protection: enabling sustainable choices and ending greenwashing

 EC, here

GOOGLE-OSTACOLI ALLA PORTABILITÀ DEI DATI: impegni proposti

 AGCM, qui

Post-EC Technical Workshop on Messaging Interoperability: What Stakeholders are Saying

 Matrix, here

Carl Schwan, here

Firefox, here

J. Blessing, R. Anderson, here

J. Len et al., here

Chatbots, deepfakes, and voice clones: AI deception for sale

 FTC, here

Making sense of NCAs’ roles under the DMA – The Dutch proposal

 The Platform Law blog, here

Wettbewerb und Nachhaltigkeit in Deutschland und der EU

 HHU-Zukunftsgruppe Competition & Sustainability, hier

FTC Seeks Comment on Business Practices of Cloud Computing Providers that Could Impact Competition and Data Security

 FTC, here

Friday, March 10, 2023

Architectural options for messaging interoperability

 E. Rescorla, here.

Proposed Digital India Act 2023

 Presentation here.

The Great Antitrust Retreat: Why We Should Worry About the New Commission’s Statement of Objections to Apple

 O. Borgogno, here

Falling costs of AI may leave its power in hands of a small group - Start-ups will find it harder to challenge main industry players

 FT, here (and here). 

FTC Seeks Public Comment on Franchisors Exerting Control Over Franchisees and Workers

 Here

ChatGPT and the AI Act

 N. Helberger, N. Diakopoulos, here

Understanding Social Media Recommendation Algorithms

 A. Narayanan, here

Meta is building a decentralized, text-based social network

 Platformer, here

UK merger control in 2023

 CMA, here

"Towards the Artificial Intelligence Act"

 EDPS, here

Thursday, March 09, 2023

WhatsApp would not remove end-to-end encryption for UK law, says chief

 The Guardian, here

Code of Conduct on Data Sharing in Tourism

 T. Breton introduces, here

U.S., EU kick off AI research collaboration

 Axios, here

Brazil central bank greenlights Meta's WhatsApp merchant payment system

 Reuters, here

Justice Department’s Suit to Block JetBlue’s Proposed Acquisition of Spirit

 D. Mekki, here

How we Build Platforms

 M. Nottingham, here

Android’s new OEM rules in India swap “requirements” with “revenue sharing”

 Ars Technica, here

The signal of compliance

 R. Horning, here

Exploring Global Enforcement Trends

 OECD Open Day 2023, here

An Excessive Evidentiary Burden Sunk the FTC’s Case Against the Meta/Within Merger

 S. Salop, here

Early thoughts on regulating generative AI like ChatGPT

 Brookings, here

ACTUAL POTENTIAL COMPETITION: FTC V. META/WITHIN COURT VALIDATES ODD-SOUNDING THEORY

 S. Cernak, here

Alexa, what happened?

 R. Roy, here

Reclaiming The Antitrust Law Of Potential Competition Mergers

 H. Hovenkamp, here

Draft guidance on the application of the Chapter I prohibition in the Competition Act 1998 to environmental sustainability agreements

 CMA, here

Creative destruction in digital ecosystems revisited

Hausfeld, here.  

The risk of Microsoft owning the operating system for digital economy

 Euractiv, here

Yale’s Tobin Center Assembles Leading Economists to Tackle Digital Market Regulation

 Yale, here

A Triple Shift for competition policy

 M. Vestager, here

Sustainable industries through digital supply chains?

 HIIG, here

National Cybersecurity Strategy

 The White House, here

The internet is about to get a lot safer

 MIT Technology Review, here

Expanding ecosystems of digital platform service providers

 ACCC, Issues Paper here

CMA Economic Research Strategy

 CMA, here

Monday, March 06, 2023

Second EU Technical Workshop, on interoperability of messaging services: The Recording

 Here (the Italian lady continuously touching her hair and being allergic to reading her speech like almost everybody else did it's yours truly!)

Third EU technical workshop: The DMA and app store related provisions

 My Tweets: 

Starting soon! #DMA #participatoryimplementation #tweetingwave

App Stores in the #DMA : much to say! @VRobCompLawImage
Art 5(4) DMA an "anti-anti-steering provision" 
Art 5(5) corollary to Art 5(4) - focusing on end users
@VRobCompLaw (Kindle on my mind...) 
Art 5(7) inter alia promoting innovation in ancillary (as Vicky calls them) services... 
Compliance report key, of course - last week we discussed *a lot* the reference offer instead 
Vanessa @beuc : streaming, price matters a lot to consumers, a survey showed - lack of transparency is one of the issues - (BTW, anti-circumvention as the Star Provision so far) 
When is the "end user acquired"? 
Provisions considered in isolation, concrete risk of abuse being shifted somewhere else @Spotify 
[Can't help thinking about "The Playlist" - am I the only one?]Image
Throwing sand into the gears of interoperability - yep, real risk... 
FRAND + anticircumvention [a bit like reference offer + anticircumvention with regard to Article 7 - we proposed an internal dispute resolution mechanism last week as part of the "blessed" reference offer] 
Great seeing representatives of competitive app stores in the audience - and immediately discussing interoperability! 
[Yes, Vanessa: Student just wrote a thesis on deceptive/dark patterns - and it's really scary!] 
App developer: "we all agree that the past is the past". In the future, how can we make ensure that smaller developers can profit from a trusted environment? 
Huge incentives for gatekeepers still to provide app stores under the DMA - oh yeah, and Hayek would agree (wrote about it in WuW research.owlit.de/document/5ef7f…)
App developers' incentives to provide privacy and security 🤔- choice to continue with the app store but you'd have the *choice* as an app developer #DMAisaboutchoice printed on my new T-shirt 
Alternative OSs! Yes, let's talk about future frictions - but also learning from the past 
Compliance reports should be live documents if you ask me... 
Yes, juicy technical questions -luckily, last weeks we had other panels taking care of those 😊 
Keynote from a NCA @AutoriteitCM - yes, involve them #participatoryimplementation forward looking 
"The gatekeepers are going to be regulated companies" - banking provides good lessons, indeed! 
"Effective compliance" is not only legal compliance - continuous process 👏 
"Details matter" - avoiding friction is key here. Consult specialists, consumer groups, behavioural psychologists 
Cooperation among digital regulators - Inspired by the UK, inspired by Giovanni Buttarelli - why is it still taking so long, the naive mind is asking? 
I asked Martijn @AutoriteitCM online what the most effective things are that the NCAs could concretely do to make the DMA work as the legislator intended - no time/no choice. Idea 🤔... seconding staff with more regulatory experience, for instance? 
"Outside the app": web based apps, sideloading and alternative app stores @kraemer_ 
Art 6(4) - Art 5(7) - Art 6(3) - Art 6(7) - provisions not to be implemented in isolation #obligationsarenotislands 
"Unprecedented change in the regulatory framework" @Apple 
"Necessary steps": discuss. 
"New world of alternative distribution* @Apple - in the service of European citizens, ultimately benefitting them [Non-EU consumers wondering why they are excluded from these benefits, at some point 🤔?] 
Third-party stores: what do they need? Fair competition based on trust [apply EU rules already there; essential, useful security prompts; no extra fees], etc.] 
"Web apps need to be just apps" 
No gatekeeper should be entitled to decide what security, privacy, etc. look like. 
Source code for effective review - with no dual/triple role (making a cut; own apps) - [Q.: how on earth are we still be discussing whether mobile ecosystems are totally flawed or not? The legislator has decided they are, we have rules that should be implemented - full stop] 
[Lively discussion on Mastodon as well] 
We are at the beginning of this process, months and years to come, says @Apple - well, the EU legislator has set the pace, for gatekeepers to comply 
Coming up, hopefully, a more "all hands on deck" panel discussion on how to properly implement those provisions - in Rupprecht @ruppe_p we trust. 
What are the conditions of access as of Article 6(12)? ✅
What is FRAND? The DMA might help✅Image
COM AssessmentImage
Separating fees, creating transparency, based on hard data, etc., so difficult? We'll see... 
The importance of data, reminds @SchibstedGroup - access to data - compliant with the GDPR. 
The importance of engineers talking to engineers - agreed, @Google 
Where does the value sit, both for app developers and the app marketplace providers? 
One q in sli.do "Should analysis of "value" include the value that GKs derive from the presence of apps in their stores? inc value of data collected and how it is used by GKs?" and, I would add, also in terms of profiting from "innovation disclosure"?
Well, associations should disclose whether they get financing from potential gatekeepers. I did disclose that I wrote a study for a MEP. 
My Q: "How would Prof. Podszum envisage that the EC could involve third parties when assessing FRAND conditions ("as part of safety net, as he pointed out")? 
Thank you for the answer, Rupprecht - agreed, many tables! @ruppe_p 

Sunday, March 05, 2023

European Citizens' Virtual Worlds Panel: A new phase of citizen engagement

 EC, here

The "most fabulous conference @BruxConf2023", unrolled

Historic times that we are living right now @vestager 
A *very* long chapter on subsidies, understandably - entrepreneurs, not taxpayers, creating jobs...#BruxConf2023 
Green claims - calling the green bluff if we see it @vestager #BruxConf2023 
Digital markets have not fulfilled their promise(s)..."we cannot be accused of having been too fast" @vestager #BruxConf2023 
"Reformulating concerns" - direct focus on consumers themselves #Apple 
"Full toolbox" 🗜️🔧🔨✂️🔭🪛🪚🔮 
International cooperation in merger control important indeed - the @WSJ had an interesting article on that, recently... 
"We have war in Europe"@vestager top of our mind 
Political economy, the idea of cheap is going away @RanaForoohar #BruxConf2023 
One of my personal heroes 👉@chopracfpb 
Promoting entry, promoting resilience, a way of *American/Germanic* thinking? "It's a new book that we are writing" #BruxConf2023 
[we had the "new book" discussion only yesterday evening with a dear friend economist] 
Antitrust is the bare minimum - open banking's plug, sector regulation @chopracfpb 
"We all know why" US Big Tech legislation wasn't passed @chopracfpb - the EU #DMAMiracle instead - not perfect but workable 
Yep, new economic paradigm not very clear yet - exciting times! @RanaForoohar 
"It's settled a bit that it didn't work" @chopracfpb 
"This isn't the coffee break" @Caffar3Cristina makes clear 
Let's discuss the Biden Executive Order - Really @superwuster #BruxConf2023 
[Pity I wrote this concurrences.com/IMG/pdf/06.con… too early]
"It's an expert thing" - well, I think that effects of the shift should also be palpable (kitchen table topic, e.g. "look, we have interoperability we grandma's favourite service!"] 
Exculpatory narratives (@superwuster), demand for them and agencies believing them - what could possibly go wrong? 
In full praise of the New Brandeisians, apparently @AMundt_BKartA #BruxConf2023 
But what bout the Courts? @AMundt_BKartA #posture v. #law 
"Not close to the more economic approach" but revising the economic toolbox @AMundt_BKartA #BruxConf2023 
...with a little help from the German legislator - and more coming 😉#BruxConf2023 
Thrilled that many are mentioning UK open banking - it's much about interoperability (open APIs, etc.), guys #BruxConf2023 
More economics, less enforcement, suboptimal economic effects @TomValletti - one merger per year prohibited by @EU_Competition 
The "Orthodox but progressive" economist says, please, not more "allegedly sophisticated economics" - incentives, resources all wrong @TomValletti - simple and coherent economics needed 
...economics helpful in understanding business strategy, incentives, etc. Agree, but well beyond IO, if I may 
The amazing @johnmarknewman up now: "the law has some catching up to do" 
Rusty legal tools - but not dead law #Meta_Within - they are on the table, and sharp enough 
Political economy we don't want: companies as central planners ("buying instead of building") @johnmarknewman 
"Antitrust is failing" and this hurts @rodgsims #BruxConf2023 
More structural provisions in merger control and more per se rules @rodgsims 
"Empire strikes back" moment might be coming @superwuster 
Common law nature of some of the changes
@superwuster
- [guidelines and other means can help institutionalize them, of course] 
"Data inflation" - legislators didn't see it @AMundt_BKartA 
Discussions, postures ok, but achieving real change is plan A - Andrea Coscelli 🙌 #BruxConf2023 
Not a 'Chicago style' simple theory is what we need, but a set of strong, flexible principles @johnmarknewman #BruxConf2023 
Ristretto and some fresh air urgently needed - but no Belgian patisserie hereImage
"Non-compete" should be a huge red flag @RKSlaughterFTC #BruxConf2023 
A very healthy industry focusing on suing the FTC @RKSlaughterFTC - not unexpected 
A history teacher before going to law school, Doha Mekki #BruxConf2023 - very useful in the current debate 
AI/ML - how is the role of data changing? Doha Mekki 
Decarbonization changing affected industries, but how? @BCoeure #BruxConf2023 
Plugging the legal gaps: more international cooperation in antitrust needed - Margarida Matos Rita #BruxConf2023 
Now the orthodox and progressive Martijin Snoep - also national *regulator* under the DMA (nice he mentioned it) #BruxConf2023 
Nice case before EU courts in merger control just mentioned "how significant" should be each individual transaction be if there are many? 
[New Competition Tool off the table - still mourning myself] 
Fairness and exploitative abuses - current Apple cases moving in that direction, we are hearing #BruxConf2023 
More sustainable supply chains in order to avoid (?) the climate disaster - Article 101.3 comes to rescue, with a couple of nudges (4.000.000 🐄in the NL) 
"Whole-of-government approach" beyond the FTC/DOJ [some agencies dragging their feet, however - my impression] #BruxConf2023 
A Cross-Atlantic chicken problem discussed like now, great! - #kitchentabletopic #BruxConf2023 
"Don't move, this isn't lunch time yet" @Caffar3Cristina 
"Courts have considerable leeway" AG Kokott #BruxConf2023 
1) Containing market power, corporate liability extended;
2) Strengthening defence rights of companies of market power - more economic approach still blossoming in the EU - perhaps revising EU Art. 102 guidelines might have helped; 
[Worrying, from a Judge: more economic approach here to stay, underenforcement a real risk] 
3) Killer acquisitions: plugging a gap possible 🙌 
Supplementary application of Art.102 (2), Art. 22 MR...Illumina good news so far, of course. 
DMA: gaps plugging in the area of merger control? 🤔#BruxConf2023 
*(2)* was actually (?) - very sceptical myself 😊 
Jonathan Kanter #BruxConf2023, all in praise of @Caffar3Cristina 👏👏👏 
"We are just getting started" @JusticeATR 
Digital:
1) How does competition in this industry present itself? A tough but essential Q. "We need models that fit facts":
-intermediaries, often endless possibilities of anticompetitive behaviour
-- concentration, tipping markets (interrelated actions)
-- setting the rules 
Self-preferencing label, not a safe-harbour Jonathan Kanter - #BruxConf2023 
Structural reliefs always on the table (thus, e.g., "incentives to interoperate" may also be triggered 👍), as already shown -BTW 
"An all-economist panel" - haven't we just heard that the more economic approach has caused underenforcement 🤔? Reflection on what went wrong but able to come up with something better, now? #BruxConf2023 
Models getting it wrong - because, e.g., free entry assumptions are, well, fugazi - nobody to blame? 
Innovation and theories of harm @johnvanreenen (me: not waiting for IO economists to develop them); praising ex-ante regulation (also in order to incrementally build expertise, an important point made by Chiara @Arcep on Monday) 
Yes, gatekeepers are going to drag their feet...So what 😊? The DMA is powerful (it helps if economists might read all those complex provisions) 
Overinvesting ("in buying") in order to keep out the competition @jan_eeckhout 
Network theory of market power - nodes and links @BPellegrino_UMD - no need to define markets (well, this is becoming less important in any case 😉) #BruxConf2023 
Working in the @FTC trenches, Aviv Nevo - we need "more economics in terms of being broader" #BruxConf2023 
Transaction values matter, says Chiara Fumagalli. Well, the DMA at least is shining some light on all the transactions by gatekeepers - focusing on the high-value ones as a second step, perhaps -#BruxConf2023 
Upcoming Merger Guidelines @Susan_Athey
What's competition, in this setting? Increasing barriers to entry, blocking a nascent competitor, future competition, and so on... 
Thinking about market definition "more realistically", to avoid "confusion", and deriving the relevant market directly from the facts @Susan_Athey #BruxConf2023 [actually, at least in Meta/Within, it was actually not much of a burden] 
Pierre Régibeau - killer acquisitions below the threshold are a thing #BruxConf2023 
PR still wishing we could devote some (academic, possibly) thinking to things we could be better - don't getting "crazy about" new theories of harm because, of course, we have so much time as we like because in the long term we'll be all dead in any case #BruxConf2023 OK 
Turning point: Furman Review - Sarah Cardell @CMAgovUK 
Uncertainty as dealt in the UK merger guidelines - one of my favourite reads - also the UK Court "liked" them BTW #BruxConf2023 
Economic framework we need: no labels, not much overlaid complexity, but they should be helpful in explaining how competition in reality works (commercial realities) - it's not a precise science, we might occasionally get it wrong - Brava 
[Personal note: my deep frustration as an antitrust legal scholar having to cope with totally unrealistic Chicago theories developed into a PhD on vertical restraints embracing broader economic theories - 20 y. ago] 
No worries, @RepKenBuck

Still alive and tweeting - thanks to plenty of water and 4 ristretti! 
Do we need an antitrust or already a much broader policy/regulatory discussion on generative AI? #BruxConf2023 
Trying to understand the tech issues - and then the adtech case came together @KenPaxtonTX #BruxConf2023 
Stéphanie Yon-Courtin blocked me on Twitter: I respect her choice 😶 
"Democratic convergence on what we wanted to achieve" @FiloBXL #BruxConf2023 
DMA: a new form of regulatory supervision - as written in the law. 
Platforms constantly changing the rules of the road @doctorow 
Are we celebrating the wrong type of innovation? - @ArielEzrachi 
[BTW - Art. 7 DMA is not *at all* backward looking 😎] 
Before the 🍾starts to flow: Olivier Guersent on ducks and chickens #BruxConf2023 
A new generation of Article 102 cases against the background of the DMA - not the end of antitrust - (agreed) OG 
[Wrong remedies in the past, shouldn't we start taking some risks as done in the US and the UK, asks Cristina?] 
"We will do it again"