OECD, here.
Showing posts with label dynamic analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dynamic analysis. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
Thursday, March 13, 2014
Monday, January 06, 2014
Competition law, intellectual property rights and dynamic analysis: Towards a new institutional “equilibrium ?”
F. Jenny, I. Lianos, H. Hovenkamp. F. Marshall, S. Sivaramjani Thambisetty, here.
Chapters, in detail:
I. Lianos, Introduction
S. Thamisetty, WHY PATENT LAW DOESN’T DO INNOVATION POLICY
H. Hovenkamp, INSTITUTIONAL ADVANTAGE IN COMPETITION AND INNOVATION POLICY
F. Jenny, ANTICOMPETITIVE ABUSES OF PATENT SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF COMPETITION AUTHORITIES
F. Marshall, A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE BRANCH COLLABORATION
Chapters, in detail:
I. Lianos, Introduction
S. Thamisetty, WHY PATENT LAW DOESN’T DO INNOVATION POLICY
H. Hovenkamp, INSTITUTIONAL ADVANTAGE IN COMPETITION AND INNOVATION POLICY
F. Jenny, ANTICOMPETITIVE ABUSES OF PATENT SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF COMPETITION AUTHORITIES
F. Marshall, A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE BRANCH COLLABORATION
Friday, January 04, 2013
Friday, June 15, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Don't look for it in Rome... Nearly two months on, the Commission’s DMA non-compliance decision against Meta was finally published... -
It was a real pleasure yesterday to share some reflections on the European experience with the Digital Markets Act across the Atlantic. You ... -
What do EU citizens expect? Digitalrechte, here. -
L. Lowe, here and here . And the EC has once again confirmed that it won't, here and here.
-
Open Future, here.
-
SOMO, here .