FTC, here.
Showing posts with label Section 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Section 5. Show all posts
Thursday, November 10, 2022
Sunday, March 01, 2015
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Friday, July 25, 2014
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Monday, November 18, 2013
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Wednesday, August 07, 2013
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Parallel Exclusion
S. Hemphill, T. Wu, here.
"In industries marked by rapid technological change, the exclusion of entrants has a far greater impact on the development of the industry. In these industries, exclusion, not price-fixing, is the “supreme evil” that antitrust should address.", p. 1212.
"In industries marked by rapid technological change, the exclusion of entrants has a far greater impact on the development of the industry. In these industries, exclusion, not price-fixing, is the “supreme evil” that antitrust should address.", p. 1212.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
Friday, October 19, 2012
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Monday, May 07, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Centre for a Digital Society , Video here . These are my very rough talking points on pay or okay in full length (more than I actually had...
-
LG Frankfurt am Main, 2-06 O 172/09 (verkündet am 13.05.2009). Lesenswertes aus der Begründung (meine Hervorhebungen): "Vorstellbare ...
-
Stratechery, here .
-
Here (thanks to Netzpolitik).
-
G. Kallfass, presentation here .
-
Public Knowledge, here .
-
Securityledger.com, here .