Antitrust as Disruptive Innovation in Health Care: Can Limiting State Action Immunity Help Save a Trillion Dollars?

W. Sage & D. Hyman, here.

The When and What of Active Supervision

FTC Blog, here. 

When Regulation Protects Privilege Instead of People: Government Restraints of Trade – A Competition Enforcer’s Perspective

M. Ohlhausen, here. 

EC sends Statement of Objections to Gazprom - Factsheet

Here.

Some further background here (almost 3-year-old paper, but still as fresh as a daisy). 

Antitrust, Capture, Federalism and the North Carolina Dental Case

H. Hovenkamp, here.

North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission

US Supreme Court, here.

SCOTUS accepts teeth-whitening case; could decision impair state bars’ ability to regulate lawyers?

ABAJournal.com, here.

The FTC's Role in Shaping Antitrust Doctrine: Recent Successes and Future Targets

J. Wright, here.

Poste ha abusato della sua posizione dominante su esenzione IVA

Comunicato stampa qui, Provvedimento qui. 

Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System

No. 11–1160. Argued November 26, 2012—Decided February 19, 2013, here. 

FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.

US Supreme Court, Transcript of oral arguments here

STATE-INITIATED RESTRAINTS OF COMPETITION

7TH ASCOLA CONFERENCE, Mackenzie Presbyterian University São Paulo, Video here.

State action as one of “The Global Limits of Competition Law”

D. Gerard, here. 

Antitrust’s State Action Doctrine and the Ordinary Powers of Corporations

H. Hovenkamp, here. 

FTC finds that Carolina Dental Board's Conduct is Not Protected by the State Action Doctrine

Here.