Reuters, here.
Showing posts with label E-Book Settlement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E-Book Settlement. Show all posts
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Monday, August 19, 2013
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Vertical Restraints for On-Line Sales
P. Buccirossi, here (Note submitted to the OECD Competition Committee).
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Friday, February 08, 2013
Macmillan settles with DOJ, and Apple is last man standing in ebook pricing case
PaidContent.org, here.
Interesting to academia and beyond:
"Electronic versions of academic textbooks” are removed from the settlement’s “requirements and prohibitions” because the DOJ antitrust case focused only on trade books.
Interesting to academia and beyond:
"Electronic versions of academic textbooks” are removed from the settlement’s “requirements and prohibitions” because the DOJ antitrust case focused only on trade books.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Monday, October 15, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Why Apple is settling EC's e-books antitrust case -- but not DOJ's
Newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com, here.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
e-Books and the boundaries of Antitrust
D. Bosco, J. Jacobson, K. Piro, G. Manne, W. Rinehart, F. Siiriainen, M. Powell, A. Oh, in Tendances: Concurrences, here.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
Friday, August 31, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Panel, Programme here , Video here .
-
LG Frankfurt am Main, 2-06 O 172/09 (verkündet am 13.05.2009). Lesenswertes aus der Begründung (meine Hervorhebungen): "Vorstellbare ...
-
IPOS, here . Circular 3/18 here .
-
FTC Hearings, Video here .
-
M. Sheehan, here .