Lawprofessors.typepad.com, here.
Showing posts with label parallel exclusion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parallel exclusion. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Parallel Exclusion
S. Hemphill, T. Wu, here.
"In industries marked by rapid technological change, the exclusion of entrants has a far greater impact on the development of the industry. In these industries, exclusion, not price-fixing, is the “supreme evil” that antitrust should address.", p. 1212.
"In industries marked by rapid technological change, the exclusion of entrants has a far greater impact on the development of the industry. In these industries, exclusion, not price-fixing, is the “supreme evil” that antitrust should address.", p. 1212.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Video here . Thank you for asking, Robin. This is my short answer but happy to discuss it further. Concerning the very few words I loved ...
-
Disclosure : for 7 months covering Maria Luisa (Isa) Stasi’s leave, I had the honour of working with Article 19 and contributed to a civil s...
-
From LinkedIn, here . "Die Stiftung Marktwirtschaft gedenkt heute an die vor einem Jahr verstorbene Wettbewerbsjuristin Heike Sc...
-
From the DMA Team, on the only platform (US, ça va sans dire) they really feel at ease, apparently: here. My answer to the riddle: "E...
-
Obviously, I don’t have the answer. If you're waiting for antitrust to step in (is it exploitative behaviour? bundling? is there ...
-
EDPS, Video here. I’ve watched almost all of it, but in terms of substance it was rather thin. Von der Leyen I's data economy strate...
-
Re:publica 25, hier.