Tuesday, September 29, 2009
AAI: RPM should remain a "hardcore restriction"
Comments of the American Antitrust Institute on the European Commission's proposed BER and Guidelines on vertical restraints.
The US Goverment's position on Bilski
A suggestion that software should be left substantially patentable? S. also Groklaw's post.
The Court of First Instance on the distinctive character of a mark
Smiley: decorative function, not a distinctive sign, Case T‑139/08, The Smiley Company SPRL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
Y. Takamika, K. Shiozaki, here and here .
-
Wine: our data, our ideas, our creations...our blood :) One almost misses those conferences on the differences between the DMA and the DMCC...
-
J. van den Boom et al., here .
-
G. Tan, here .
-
OECD, here. Tbd today, Trento U.
-
M. Kirkwood, here .
-
CMA (not an April's Fool, in case you were wondering), here.
-
Andreas Schwab: Assessing DMA Compliance | Future Designations | Clarity v Vagueness | What is Next?Chez Oles, here . Politely disagree with the great Andreas Schwab on many points :) (e.g., 'DSA supervisory fee model' for t...