Webinar presentation slides, here.
Monday, January 06, 2014
What technological developments (and related legal issues) will 2014 bring?
Taylorwessing.com, here.
Competition law, intellectual property rights and dynamic analysis: Towards a new institutional “equilibrium ?”
F. Jenny, I. Lianos, H. Hovenkamp. F. Marshall, S. Sivaramjani Thambisetty, here.
Chapters, in detail:
I. Lianos, Introduction
S. Thamisetty, WHY PATENT LAW DOESN’T DO INNOVATION POLICY
H. Hovenkamp, INSTITUTIONAL ADVANTAGE IN COMPETITION AND INNOVATION POLICY
F. Jenny, ANTICOMPETITIVE ABUSES OF PATENT SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF COMPETITION AUTHORITIES
F. Marshall, A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE BRANCH COLLABORATION
Chapters, in detail:
I. Lianos, Introduction
S. Thamisetty, WHY PATENT LAW DOESN’T DO INNOVATION POLICY
H. Hovenkamp, INSTITUTIONAL ADVANTAGE IN COMPETITION AND INNOVATION POLICY
F. Jenny, ANTICOMPETITIVE ABUSES OF PATENT SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF COMPETITION AUTHORITIES
F. Marshall, A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE BRANCH COLLABORATION
From Hydrogen Peroxide to Comcast: The New Rigor in Antitrust Class Actions
J. Keyte, P. Eckles, and K. Hoffman Lent, here.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
Podcast, here .
-
Euractiv, here. While some influential US/EU academics want us to largely forget the DMA and go back to a revised 102 😔.
-
Smh.com.au, here .
-
Computerworld, here .
-
Au sujet des critères qui guident l’appréciation des effets des clauses d’exclusivité, le Conseil dans sa décision a considérés comme décisi...
-
Slaughter & May, here .
-
Pressemeldung, hier .
-
Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, Ordonnance de référé du 16 septembre 2014, ici .