Oxford Internet Institute, here.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
INSPECTING BIG DATA’S WARHEADS
P. Ohm, here.
'I will never again think of a model without thinking of O’Neill’s lovely example of the model she uses to select what to cook for dinner for her children' how true:
Pg. 19 "The input to my internal cooking model is the information I have about my family, the ingredients I have on hand or I know are available, and my own energy, time, and ambition. The output is how and what I decide to cook. I
'I will never again think of a model without thinking of O’Neill’s lovely example of the model she uses to select what to cook for dinner for her children' how true:
Pg. 19 "The input to my internal cooking model is the information I have about my family, the ingredients I have on hand or I know are available, and my own energy, time, and ambition. The output is how and what I decide to cook. I
measure the success of a meal by how satisfied my family seems at the end of it, how much they’ve eaten, and how healthy the food was. Seeing how well it is received and how much of it is enjoyed allows me to update my model for the next time I cook. The updates and adjustments make it what statisticians call a “dynamic model.”
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
The DSA delivers, the DSA delivers not Sitting in a city park, looking at an impressive number of daisies, I am finally listening to the ver...
-
P. Girnus, here. I am the Executive Director of an independent AI policy think tank. Independent means we don't take government money....
-
What is particularly encouraging is that he's not someone who has lived exclusively within the competition policy world/bubble, but rath...
-
M. Peitz, here . [Disagree, of course]
-
OECD, here. Tbd today, Trento U.
-
ARD1, here.
-
S. Cohen, T. Davies here . A sort of licence fee ("mechanisms of compensation") is also the result we suggested coming from a ...
-
The Sling, here.
-
Hollywood Reporter, here.