DigWatch, here.
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Judge says Amazon must disclose its research funding to economists, academics and think tanks as part of a class action lawsuit.
Motion to compel, here.
Order granting motion to compel, here.
More fundamentally: does this type of intellectual capture work like this? Amazon supplies data (and money), friendly IO economists in academia supply theories - models, and the outcomes neatly reinforce the economics that defend entrenched power? Huge ROI possible.
Order granting motion to compel, here.
This is Lina Khan's article BTW, from Wavesblog archives.
[What about an academic who writes an economic paper "recommending caution" from enforcers - exculpating Amazon's self-preferencing - and a few days after publication starts working for Amazon. Does it count as external or internal?
[Possibly, however, the real problem of this type economics is that it's used by Big Tech as a distraction. [Spend precious time debating models - like Romans were doing over entrails? - instead of devoting time and efforts observing and trying to understand the complexities of the technological world and their societal implications. Clearly, we'd need a different type of social science for that]].
Virtual (ASCOLA) Townhouse Meeting With Lina Khan
September 4, 10-11 am Eastern Time, here to sign up.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
Y. Takamika, K. Shiozaki, here and here .
-
Wine: our data, our ideas, our creations...our blood :) One almost misses those conferences on the differences between the DMA and the DMCC...
-
J. van den Boom et al., here .
-
M. Kirkwood, here .
-
G. Tan, here .
-
Rollingstone, here .
-
CMA (not an April's Fool, in case you were wondering), here.
-
Mobilebusinessinsights, here.

