DigWatch, here.
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Judge says Amazon must disclose its research funding to economists, academics and think tanks as part of a class action lawsuit.
Motion to compel, here.
Order granting motion to compel, here.
More fundamentally: does this type of intellectual capture work like this? Amazon supplies data (and money), friendly IO economists in academia supply theories - models, and the outcomes neatly reinforce the economics that defend entrenched power? Huge ROI possible.
Order granting motion to compel, here.
This is Lina Khan's article BTW, from Wavesblog archives.
[What about an academic who writes an economic paper "recommending caution" from enforcers - exculpating Amazon's self-preferencing - and a few days after publication starts working for Amazon. Does it count as external or internal?
[Possibly, however, the real problem of this type economics is that it's used by Big Tech as a distraction. [Spend precious time debating models - like Romans were doing over entrails? - instead of devoting time and efforts observing and trying to understand the complexities of the technological world and their societal implications. Clearly, we'd need a different type of social science for that]].
Virtual (ASCOLA) Townhouse Meeting With Lina Khan
September 4, 10-11 am Eastern Time, here to sign up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
OECD, here. Tbd today, Trento U.
-
Theories of dynamic harm Giulio Federico, Oxera, Project Director for the Study Chiara Fumagalli, Bocconi University Nancy Rose, MIT Michele...
-
Commission provides guidance to Google for AI interoperability on Android and sharing of Google Search data under the Digital Markets Act - ...
-
MacArthur Foundation, here.
-
FT, here.

