Open Data : Météo-France ouvre ses modèles atmosphériques

Nextinpact.com, ici.

Exploring Zero-Rating Challenges: Views From Five Countries

C. Rossini, T. Moore, here. 

Disneyland Paris faces pricing probe

BBC, here.

Uber: The Mirage of the Marketplace

Slate.com, here. 

The ‘gig economy’ is coming. What will it mean for work?

TheGuardian, here. 

Why the internet of things favours dominance

TheGuardian, here.

On Extraterritoriality and the Gazprom Case

M. Martyniszyn, here. 

EDPS recommendations on the EU’s options for data protection reform

Opinion 3/2015, here. 

The European Commission’s Battle Over Pay-TV Services: Can Segmenting the EU Market Be Justified?

A. Stephan, here.

Copyright reform through competition law? The Commission’s statement of objections in the pay TV investigation

P. Ibanez-Colomo, here.

The online classroom is a surveilled classroom: no privacy here

NYBook.com, here.

Apple Music's Worst Feature? You can't delete it

Wired, here.

Advocate general deals another blow to economic assessment of rebates

KluwerCompetitionLawBlog, here. 

Is streaming good for music?

BBC World Service, Beach Podcast  here.

Can anything curb the dominance of the internet's big guns?

TheGuardian, here.

European Commission sends Statement of Objections on cross-border provision of pay-TV services available in UK and Ireland

Press Release, here. 

Oracle seeks permission to update copyright lawsuit against Google

Reuters, here.

Oracle Request to Supplement Java Lawsuit here. 

Aeroflot boykottiert Kartenzahlung

Biztravel, hier.

Wenn die Bestpreisklauseln wegfallen, sinken dann jetzt die Preise?

FAZ, hier. 

Supply Chains Morphing Into ‘Value Webs’

Deloitte, here. 

Consumer Watchdog alleges Apple Music plot to crush streaming music business

Katyonthehill.com, here.
Letter here. 

Australian Online Copyright Infringement Research

TNS for the Department of Communications, here. 

CJEU ruling in Huawei/ZTE leaves the door open to injunctive relief in SEP litigation

Allen & Overy, here. 

Google, Facebook get behind Samsung in patent battle with Apple

CNET.com, here. 

Taylor Swift: Can online travel learn from her haggling skill?

Tnooz, here. 

Auch Monopolist darf Patentverletzer verklagen

FAZ, hier. 

On-demand Transport: A discussion paper for future innovation

West Australian Department of Transport, here. 

Das Bundeskartellamt und die TV-Branche

DWDL.de, hier. 

UK non-paper on the sharing economy

Department for Business, Innovation and Skill, here. 

Airline passengers file antitrust suit against the world’s three largest global distribution systems (GDSs) for airline tickets

Tnooz.com, here. 

Uber Says Spain Legal Case Has Been Referred To The European Court Of Justice

TechCrunch, here. 

Inside Spotify’s hunt for the perfect playlist

Wired, here. 

UK government releases rules to get self-driving cars onto public roads

ArsTechnica, here. 

The Importance of Protecting Our Attention

ABC, here. 

16 Franken pro Ticket – Swiss führt GDS-Gebühr ein

TravelInside.ch, hier. 

Countries should address disruptive effects of the digital economy

OECD, Press Release, here. 

Lufthansa claims it is on solid legal ground over GDS tax move

Tnooz.com, here. See also here. 

Everything to know about the FTC’s antitrust review of Apple’s music business

WashingtonPost, here. 

Brazil agency to offer pro-competition view on any Uber lawsuits

WKZO, here. 

CJEU: Huawei v. ZTE

Press release, here. Judgment here.

"Moreover, in February 2013 a German Regional Tribunal posed to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) five questions whose answers could be influential in shaping the interpretation of Article 102 TFEU with regard to intellectual property rights’ enforcement in the context of standardization" from some notes I took back in April 2013, here (it feels like AGES ago).

Bundeskartellamt verhängt Bußgelder gegen Rüstungslieferanten wegen Kartellabsprachen

Bundeskartellamt, hier. 

European Commission opens antitrust investigations against Qualcomm—again

ArsTechnica, here.

Leniency, damages, and EU competition policy

P. Buccirossi, C. Marvão, G. Spagnolo, here. 

TripAdvisor Wins in Italy as Court Rejects Hotels’ Fake Reviews Complaints

Skift, here.

And Then the Earth Shook: Google Enters Travel Booking

Skift, here. 

Apple’s Share of Smartphone Industry’s Profits Soars to 92%

Wsj.com, here. 

Google accidentally reveals data on 'right to be forgotten' requests

TheGuardian, here. 

Position Paper on Amazon’s Book Selling Practices

Authors United, here.

Challenges for Competition Policy in a Digitalised Economy

European Parliament, here. 

Banken im Strudel der Digitalisierung

Capital.de, hier. 

Patent Landscape Report on Assistive Devices and Technologies for Visually and Hearing Impaired Persons

WIPO, here. 

Silently debuting homestays, Booking.com jabs Airbnb

Tnooz.com, here. 

Focus on the User

Here.

Costly comparison

The Economist, here.

Accusing Amazon of Antitrust Violations, Authors and Booksellers Demand Inquiry

NYTimes, here.

Spotify makes case against Apple in Congress

Politico.com, here. 

Authors Guild Slams 'Inadequate' E-book Royalty

PublishersWeekly, here,
Authors Guild's analysis here.

Platform Shift

M. Van Alstyne, here.

FTC exploring Apple rules for streaming music rivals in App Store

Reuters, here.

Google, Yelp, and the Future of Search

J. Gans, here.

A few remarks on the role of intermediaries in the Digital Economy

J. Tirole, Presentation here. 

Productivity and competition: a summary of the evidence

CMA, here. 

Google quietly adds instant booking for hotels, copying TripAdvisor

Tnooz, here. 

The government says airlines prey on consumers. That’s the government’s fault.

Washingtonpost.com, here. 

Enabling versus controlling

A. Hagiu, J. Wright, here. 

The Ecosystem of Software Platform: A Study of Asymmetric Cross-side Network Effects and Platform Governance

P. Song, L. Xue, A. Rai, C. Zhang, here. 

Dependency Challenges, Response Strategies, and Complementor Maturity: Joining a Multi-Sided Platform Ecosystem

E.Altman, here. 

France forbids rate parity clauses by law

HotRec, here.

Passionate video explaining the "Loi dite Macron's" OTAs provisions and much more here (French).

A Regulator’s Comparison Website for Energy Tariffs is Not Sensible

S.Littlechild, here. 

European Commission sends Statement of Objections to MasterCard on cross-border rules and inter-regional interchange fees

Press Release, here. 

Abonnement illimité : après la médiation, l'Autorité de la concurrence...

ActuaLitté, ici. Voir également ici.
Avis de la médiatrice du livre (9/2/2015) ici. 

Gestures Will Be the Interface for the Internet of Things

Hbr.org, here.

Google's ad system: too big to control

Wired, here.

Right to open access laid down in Dutch Copyright Act

UU.nl, here. 

Facebook voices support for EU data protection law changes

V3.co.uk, here.

(A true "man bites dog" moment).

Rapport annuel 2014

B. Lasserre, Présentation à la presse, ici. 

Le dommage à l’économie

Autorité de la concurrence, ici. 

Passengers sue airlines over allegations of price collusion

TheHill, here.

Données de santé : anonymat et risque de ré-identification

Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques (Drees), ici. 

Are the European Competition Authorities making a less anticompetitive market more anticompetitive? The Booking.com saga

P. Akman, here. 

Complaint Regarding Google’s Failure To Offer ‘Right To Be Forgotten’ In The U.S

Consumer Watchdog, here. 

Competitive neutrality and its application in selected developing countries

UNCTAD, here.

Activating Actavis in Europe – The Proposal of a “Structured Effects-based” Analysis for Pay for Delay Settlements

S. Gullasch, here. 

Adding a New Dimension to EU Pharmaceutical Antitrust - Pay for Delay Settlements as Part of a Unilateral Strategy such as Product Hopping

S. Gullasch, here. 

Neuer juristischer Ärger für Daimler-Tochter myTaxi wegen Rabatten

Heise.de, hier.

Bulgarian Competition Authority has fined the companies that provide Uber's services

Novinite.com, here.
Press Release of the Commission for Protection of Competition, here.

Google Translate: 

CPC penalize companies Hubert Dutch BV and Razier Opareyshans BV with 50 000 lev for violations under Art. 29 of the LPC (general prohibition of unfair competition) in connection with the provision of the service UberX in the city. Sofia on 12.09.2014 In its decision, the Commission states the termination of the infringements. , and immediate execution of the decision in that part .

The proceedings is initiated automatically by a Commission decision in relation to the received from the Municipality of Sofia information on the introduction of the service "UberX" in the city. Sofia and subsequently merged with other proceedings instituted at the request of "Okay Supertrans" against AD "Hubert Bulgaria" EOOD, again in connection with the service UberX .

During the study found that in providing the service UberX by Hubert BV and Razier Opareyshans BV offenses against the general prohibition of Art. 29 of the CPA. The service has the marks of taxi passengers as far as is done by car fee, requested by the passenger route through the mobile app Uber, which liaises between the passenger and the actual executor of carriage - the user-guide.A comparison between p redlaganite by Hubert BV and Razier Opareyshans BV services and services provided by other mobile applications (even the services of a typical taxi companies) reaches the conclusion that the services are interchangeable, since   lead to the same result - the implementation of a paid shuttle point to another. But in the case at UberX not require the contractor to transport meets specified in the Bulgarian legislation requirements to taxi drivers and their cars. In this sense, when providing service process Hubert BV and Razier Opareyshans BV violate fair trade practice being contrary to the statutory rules governing the conduct of public transport / taxi. Hubert BV and Razier Opareyshans BV create conditions for circumvention, saving users guides means of obtaining the necessary licenses and permits for taxis. Thus the defendants violated the rules of fair competition, procure unfair advantage over competitors and the economic benefit of this behavior.

The Commission also imposed a fine of two companies 50 000 Levs of default for assistance for lack of refined during the study information.

 Commission finds that by "Hubert Bulgaria" EOOD is not a violation of art. 29 of the CPA, as the company is not directly involved in providing the service UberX,   and perform ancillary to Hubert B. C.

Full text of the Decision in Bulgarian, here. 

Net Neutrality: Department of Telecom panel against Facebook's Internet.org, favours Airtel Zero

IndiaToday, here. 

Personal Data and Privacy

WIK-Consult for Ofcom, here.

Orphan works in the US: getting rid of “a frustration, a liability risk, and a major cause of gridlock”?

R.Meier, here. 

Discovering the Miracle of Large Numbers of Antitrust Investigations in Russia: The Role of Competition Authority Incentives

S. Advasheva, D. Tsytsulina, S. Golovanova,  Y. Sidorova, here. 

Promoting or restricting competition?: Regulation of the UK retail residential energy market since 2008

S. Littlechild, here. 

Product Redesign and the Abuse of Dominance: The apple IPod Itune Litigation

L. Popofsky, here. 

The Fine Line Between “Fortuitous Discovery” and “Fishing Expedition:" CoJ Finds Dawn Raids by the EC to be Illegal

Steptoe.com, here. 

Netzneutralität: Europa schafft ab

FAZ, hier. 

At last, Uber has found a friend in India

QZ.com, here. 

UK Energy market investigation

Summary of provisional findings report, here; Notice of possible remedies, here. 

Marktmachtmissbrauch der Deutsche Post AG im Bereich der Großkundentarife

Bundeskartellamt, hier. 

Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination

Am.Datta, Michael C. Tschantz, and An. Datta, here.

Probing the Dark Side of Google’s Ad-Targeting System

Technologyreview.com, here. 

Openness/Open Access for Public Sector information and works — the Creative Commons licensing model

Epsiplatform.eu, here. 

Why Airbnb needs to be better at search than Google

Wired, here.

Google gets into the carpooling game with the launch of RideWith in Israel

VentureBeat, here. See also here. 

International cooperation in merger cases as a tool for effective enforcement of competition law

UNCTAD Secretariat, here. 

The role of competition in the pharmaceutical sector and its benefits for consumers

UNCTAD Secretariat, here.
See other contributions and presentations here. 

Writers Are Going Cuckoo For Kindle Unlimited

TechCrunch, here. 

The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value Beyond the Hype

McKinsey, here. 

Are National Courts the Addressees of the Infosoc Three-Step Test?

R. Arnold, E. Rosati, here. 

Après Uber, AirBnb dans le collimateur de Bercy ?

Deplacementspros.com, ici. 

Beach Reading: "Debt: The First 5,000 Years"

D. Graeber, here.

Vivil startet Pilotprozess gegen Südzucker

Handelsblatt, hier.

The French, Italian and Swedish Competition Authorities Accept the Commitments Offered by Booking.com

ECN Brief 2/2015, here.
No direct link, hence:

In their investigations of so-called "price parity" clauses (also called "best price" clauses) contained in agreements between online travel agencies (OTAs) and hotels, the French Competition Authority (FCA), the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) and the Swedish Competition Authority (SCA) coordinated their investigations and, on 21 April 2015, adopted parallel decisions accepting identical commitments [1] from the market-leading OTA Booking.com and making them binding in their respective jurisdictions. The European Commission assisted the authorities in coordinating their work.

OTAs such as Booking.com operate internet platforms, on which consumers can search for, compare and book hotel rooms free of charge. Hotels only pay commission to the OTA for its services when a booking is made. The price parity clauses essentially require the hotels to offer the same or a better room price on Booking.com's platform as they offer on their other sales channels, including the hotel's own direct sales channels, be it online or offline. This means that Booking.com can raise its commission rate without the risk that hotels will translate this cost increase by offering higher room prices on Booking.com’s platform than on competing OTA platforms. The price parity clause, combined with the fact that hotels generally tend to sign up with several competing platforms, implies that Booking.com has less incentive to compete with other OTAs by charging lower commission rates to hotels than would otherwise be the case. As a result, the price parity clauses may restrict competition between existing OTAs and may lead to higher commission rates, which in turn may translate into higher consumer prices for hotel rooms. Furthermore, the price parity clause may constitute a barrier to entry on the market, by making it more difficult for an OTA to enter or expand on the market by competing with low commission rates in exchange for hotels offering lower room prices on that OTA’s platform. The three national competition authorities (NCAs) launched investigations to ascertain whether the price parity clauses in Booking.com’s agreements with hotels infringed the prohibition of restrictive agreements in Article 101 TFEU and, in the case of France and Sweden, the equivalent national legislation. The FCA’s investigation was also initiated on the basis of a possible infringement of the prohibition against abuse of dominance of Article 102 TFEU and its national equivalent.

In the course of the investigations, Booking.com conducted a customer survey of 14 000 consumers in 9 Member States and produced economic papers to argue, essentially, that parity between room prices in hotels’ own sales channels and prices offered on Booking.com’s platform is important in preventing free-riding on Booking.com’s investments and ensuring the continued supply of search and comparison services free of charge to consumers.

To solve the identified competition concerns, Booking.com offered a first version of commitments that were market tested and subsequently improved. In essence, the adopted commitments prevent Booking.com from requiring hotels to offer better or equal room prices via Booking.com than they do via competing OTAs. In addition, Booking.com cannot prevent hotels from offering discounted room prices provided that these are not marketed or made available to the general public online. The discounted prices can be offered online to members of a hotel’s loyalty scheme and/or via offline channels (e g direct emails, telephone and walk-in bookings).

The three NCAs performed economic analyses of the commitments and concluded that the will meet their competition concerns. The commitments will put pressure on OTAs' commission rates and the quality of service, which will ultimately lead to lower room prices and better services for consumers. The commitments will also make it easier for new OTAs to enter the market and for innovative OTAs to expand.

Following the commitment decision, the Booking.com cases were closed in France, Italy and Sweden. However, the respective competition authorities continue their investigations concerning Expedia’s price parity clauses and in France also concerning HRS's parity clauses.

See further:

Decision of the Autorité de la concurrence:

Decision of the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato:

Decision of the Konkurrensverket (translation):

[1] The French version of the commitments provides for a mid-term review.

OTA lobby report preceded US airline antitrust inquiry, House of Cards-style

Tnooz.com, here. 

Uber annonce la suspension d’UberPop en France

Le Monde, ici. 

OTAs see chaos when rate parity ends

HotelMarketing.com, here. 

Challenging assumptions about behavioral policy

Behavioral Science & Policy Association, here. 

Ubérisation : une course au moins disant social ?

Mechanical Turk

F. Marty, ici. 

Dutch universities start their Elsevier boycott plan

Vermeer, Brieflezende vrouw in het blauw

Universonline.nl, here. 

Expedia gleicht seine AGB an die von Booking.com an: Der nächste Bluff im Paritäten-Poker

Hotellerie.de, here.

Antitrust Economics 2.0

Lear Conference, all presentations available here. 

Booking.com mis en demeure par l'UFC-Que Choisir pour ses conditions générales d'utilisation

Numerama.com, ici. 

Expedia Amends Rate, Conditions and Availability Parity Clauses

Expediainc.com, here. 

"Predatory Privacy": The Limits of Economic Analysis

O. Lynskey, Presentation here. 

PCWs & other matching platforms - The frenemies of competition

T. Curzon Price, Presentation here. 

Best Price Clauses Set by Intermediation Platforms: Disentangling the Effects

K.-U. Kühn, Presentation here. 

Data Privacy, Data Sharing and the Internet of Things

J. Porter, Presentation here. 

Schleppende Zulassung von UberX-Fahrern

wiwo.de, hier.

Apple Music Is For People With No Clue What To Stream

TechCrunch, here.

(the first cats on @Wavesblog ever - début in 2007)

Uber Stages Protest At NYC City Hall Against Bill Throttling New Driver Signups

Techcrunch.com. here. 

Canada : des bibliothécaires dénoncent le racket des exemplaires numériques

Actualitte.com, here.

104-page Disconnect's Complaint against Google (Android)

Non-confidential copy, here.

(Plenty of fascinating tech details)

Appeals court says Apple is liable for e-book price fixing

ArsTechnica, here.

Il diritto di fotografare la grande bellezza che divide l'Europa

Genoa, "Bolla" by Renzo Piano
(and "Matitone" in the background)

 LaRepubblica.it, qui.

Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin: Privacy Needs to Be the Default, Not an Option

Wired, here. 

The Internet of Things Changes the Company-Customer Relationship

P. Weichselbaum, here. 

Apple expanding user privacy, will prevent iOS apps from seeing other installed apps

AppleInsider.com, here. 

When Regulation Protects Privilege Instead of People: Government Restraints of Trade – A Competition Enforcer’s Perspective

M. Ohlhausen, here. 

Supreme Court won’t weigh in on Oracle-Google API copyright battle

ArsTechnica, here. 

Tim Wu: "The main surprising and shocking realization is that Google is not presenting its best product"

Recode.net, here. Study here. 

Uber: more like eBay than like McDonald’s?

NewYorker.com, here. 

Deux dirigeants d'Uber en garde à vue

Numerama.com, ici.

L’innovation de rupture: de nouveaux défis pour le droit de la concurrence

T. Schrepel, ici. 

Oracle v. Google Android-Java copyright case goes back to San Fran: Supreme Court denies Google petition

Fosspatents.com, here. 

The German Pillow Fight Drags On: "Caution with new terms of Booking.com!"

German Hotel Association, here. 

Apparently, "everyone" knew of a leaked (online) copy of Google (Search) Statement of Objections - I didn't

With a little help from @wavesblog readers, perhaps?

ProSiebenSat.1 acquires German online price comparison business Verivox for up to €210 million

Tech.eu, here. 

Warning: You are about to be nudged

G. Loewenstein, C. Bryce, D. Hagmann, & S. Rajpal, here.

Uber’s Biggest Rival In China Claims It Handles 3 Million Rides Per Day

Techcrunch.com, here. 

Booking.com alarmed by France’s new hotel rate parity plans

Hotelmarketing, here.
The original LesEchos article here. 

Uber, sharing and the compensation mechanism

J. Gans, here. 

Is Google Degrading Search? Consumer Harm from Universal Search

M. Luca, T. Wu and the Yelp Data Science Team, here. 

Two-Sided Platforms: Discussion

Here

S. Vezzoso (this blog's author), Presentation here. 

Bundeskartellamt verhängt Bußgelder in Höhe von 75 Mio. Euro gegen Automobilzulieferer

Bundeskartellamt, hier.

Uber hits legal speed bumps

Politico.eu, here.

SCOTUS Reaffirms that in Antitrust Cases, It Gives Less Deference to Precedent

JDSupra.com, here.

Cloud Giants And The War For Customer Data

TeleCrunch, here. 

The Washington Post built a social network for its freelancers to better match skills to stories

NiemanLab, here.

Getty Joins EU’s Google Complaint

WSJ, here. 

Verlagsgruppe Bonnier gibt hartes DRM in E-Books auf

Heise.de, hier.

Platfoms (of) Power

R. Mansell, here. 

How Taylor Swift revealed (and healed) Apple's rift with musicians

Wired.co.uk, here. 

Apple Says “We Hear You Taylor Swift”, Will Pay Artists During Free Trial

TechCrunch, here.

L'économie collaborative

France Culture, Podcast ici.

The Economist as Engineer

Freakeconomics, Podcast here.

Domaine Public, abus et Amazon

Framablog, ici.

Uber driver case poses questions for ‘sharing economy’

FT, here.

"The case highlighted a fundamental dilemma for internet companies built on the booming freelance sector. Establishing some level of control over the workers who use their platforms is often essential to ensuring a consistent level of service.

But the further they go — for instance, by laying down standards of training or conduct — the more they lay themselves open to one day being forced to accept the full responsibilities of employers. For the California labour commissioner, Uber’s control of pricing, tipping, driver ratings and the type of car made it look like an employer."

UK private copyright exception 'unlawful', rules High Court

Out-law.com, here. 

Data and trust in digital markets: what are the concerns for competition and for consumers?

Wallace Collection, London

A. Chrisholm, here. 

EU Competition Tender: Feasibility study on the microeconomic impact of enforcement of competition policies on innovation

Here.

(Eagerly waiting  for the results).

Les hôteliers se réjouissent, Booking.com fait grise mine

Challenges.fr, ici. 

Competition and politics: what does a healthy relationship look like?

A. Chrisholm, here. 

Online reviews and endorsements

CMA, Report here.

Ambition Numérique

Rapport, CNNum, ici.

Dealing with Losers: The Political Economy of Policy Transitions

M. Trebilcock, here. 

Google Is Its Own Secret Weapon in the Cloud

NYT, here. 

Google’s War Against Apps

Theinformation.com, here (paywall).
See also here, here and here.

CCP Annual Conference 2015 Live Blogging

Here.
Conference Programme here. 

Core data protection topics in the perspective of the trilogue between European institutions.

WP29, here. 

Vertikale Preisbindung im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel - Großteil der Bußgeldverfahren abgeschlossen

Bundeskartellamt.de, hier.
Fallberichte hier (Röstkaffee), hier (Haribo-Produkte) und hier (Ritter-Produkte).

Should Uber be Allowed to Compete in Europe? And if so How?

D. Geradin, here. 

«L'Internet est sorti du temps de l'innocence»

Libération, ici. 

US Supreme Court Leaves Standing Decisions on Foreign Antitrust Conduct

K. Bolan, S. Meisner, A. Smith, here. 

Online Copyright Enforcement, Consumer Behavior, and Market Structure

L. Aguiar, J. Claussen, C. Peukert, here. 

First new private bank opens in UK for 30 years

FT, here. 

Five for Five – Amazon Inks Deal With Random Penguin

The-digital-reader, here. 

Independence is non-negotiable

M. Vestager, here. 

Game of Thrones breaks piracy records once again

Futureofcopyright, here. 

Court of Human Rights holds news portal liable for user comments

@Technollama, here. 

Brief Amici Curiae on Behalf of 70 Law, Economics, and Business Professors and the American Antitrust Institute - Loestrin pay-for-delay case

Here. 

Ten years of commitment decisions under Article 9 of Regulation 1/2003: Too much of a good thing?

W. Wils, here. 

UK Record labels attack Apple deals that would leave them 'deeply unsatified'

Telegraph.co.uk, here. 

The Commercial Use of Consumer Data

DotEcon with Analysys Mason for the CMA, here.
See also the Report on the CMA’s call for information, here. 

Internet-Plattformen: Innovation siegt stets über Gerechtigkeit

E. Morozov, hier. 

Amazon Is Building An App To Let Normal People Deliver Packages For Pay

TechCrunch, here.

How big is the self-publishing market? Only Amazon knows

TheBookseller.com, here. 

Time to stick a fork in these Android competition complaints

Computer & Communications Industry Association, here. 

European Commission approves joint venture for cross-border licensing of online music between PRSfM, STIM and GEMA, subject to commitments

Press Release, here. 

Open Letter on the Digital Economy

 1995

Here. 

Julia Reda's Press Conference

Video here (from 0:30)

U.S. Court Upholds Antitrust Action Against Patent Troll

Dilbert.com

M. Carrier, here. 

Apple News: I Do Not Agree To Your Terms

MikeAsh.com, here. 

The General Court upholds the registration of the shape of Lego figures as a Community trade mark

Judgments in Cases T-395/14 and T-396/14 Best-Lock Europe (Ltd) v OHIM — Lego Juris, Press Release here. 

More data protection is better than less

V. Reding, here. 

New Kindle Unlimited Payout Structure

HughHowey, here. See also here. 

Where are Maps going?

Asymco, here. 

European Ministers Agree To Disagree On Data Protection Reform

TechCrunch, here. 

Report on the remote Ebook Lending Pilots

The Society of Chief Librarians and The Publishers Association, here. 

Here’s What Happens to Your $10 After You Pay for a Month of Apple Music

Recode.net, here. 

Google Says More Than Half Of Its UK Searches Are Performed On Mobile

SearchEngineLand, here. 

Discount Contact Lens Retailers Given OK to Lower Prices

NYT, here.

Background info here. 

La loi met fin à la parité tarifaire et instaure le contrat de mandat

TendenceHotelliere.fr, ici. 

Relationship Between Public and Private Antitrust Enforcement

OECD, Note by the Secretariat, here. 

Competition Enforcement in Oligopolistic Markets

OECD, Issues Paper, here. 

Disruptive Innovation

OECD, Issues Paper, here. 

Competition Neutrality

OECD, Issues Paper, here. 

At Art Basel, a Powerful Jury Controls the Market

NYT, here.

Who will win the streaming wars?

FT, here.

Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries and Archives: Updated and Revised

K. Crews for WIPO, here.

WIPO Marrakesh Treaty For Blind Readers In Force In Early 2016? Now Part Of Bigger UN Process

IP-Watch, here.

The Antitrust Analysis of Rules and Standards for Software Platforms and Its Implications for China

D. Evans, V. Yanhua Zhang, here. 

La CNIL met en demeure Google de procéder aux déréférencements sur toutes les extensions du moteur de recherche

Communiqué de presse, ici. Décision, ici. 

Airbnb And The Problem Of Data

TechCrunch, here.

Les hôteliers retrouvent une totale liberté dans la fixation de leurs prix

Les Echos, ici.

A voir aussi UMIH, communiqué de presse, ici. 

The UK Booksellers Association leads way in Amazon competition inquiry

Thebookseller.com, here. 

What does the open sourcing of Swift mean for me?

EKreative, here. 

Amazon’s E-Books Business Investigated by European Antitrust Regulators

NYT, here.

Börsenverein's reaction here (D). See also here (D). 

Die FIFA-WM als Platform

J. Haucap, hier. 

Creating a better India – Musings on economic governance of India

N. Murthy, here. 

European Commission opens formal investigation into Amazon's e-book distribution arrangements

Press Release, here.

TDF sanctionnée pour avoir mis en place des pratiques tendant à évincer ses concurrents du site de la Tour Eiffel.

Autorité de la concurrence, ici. 

What Apple’s Tim Cook Overlooked in His Defense of Privacy

NYT, here.

Net neutrality takes effect Friday; ISPs scramble to avoid complaints

ArsTechnica, here. 

Google: "Jedes deutsche Auto wird von einem Computer gesteuert werden“

FAZ, hier. 

Competition Culture Project Report

ICN Advocacy Working Group, here. 

All of Germany just signed up to this micropayment app that people think is the future of news on the web

BusinessInsider, here. 

We aren’t the copyright cops, ICANN’s president says

WashingtonPost, here.

Analysing Google's Public Response to the EC's Statement of Objections

Foundem, here.

(Cool interactive presentation, possibly created with Visme - whose licence is a little expensive, though).

Ex-post economic evaluation of competition policy enforcement: A review of the literature

EC, DG Competition, here. 

Apple Music faces antitrust scrutiny in NY, Connecticut

Reuters.com, here. See also the NYT, here. 

Self-Regulation and Innovation in the Peer-to-Peer Sharing Economy

M.Cohen & A. Sundararajan, here.

Outsourcing Tasks Online: Matching Supply and Demand on Peer-to-Peer Internet Platform

Z. Cullen, C. Farronato, here. 

Corporate Alliances Matter Less Thanks to APIs

Hbr.org, here. 

First Principles for Regulating the Sharing Economy

S. Miller, here. 

Apple Announces News App for iPhone & iPad

Apple.com, here. 

Should Google be forced to offer privacy apps? EU fight offers test

Fortune, here. 

No Such Thing as a Free Search: Antitrust and the Pursuit of Privacy Goals

A. Burnside, here. 

Apple Stresses User Privacy At WWDC

TechCrunch, here. 

User Reputation: Building Trust and Addressing Privacy Issues in the Sharing Economy

Future of Privacy Forum, here. 

Europe’s innovation deficit isn’t disappearing any time soon

WashingtonPost, here.

Uber, Ola Drivers Protest Against Delhi Ban Amid Police Crackdown

WSJ.com, here. 

The “Sharing” Economy: Issues Facing Platforms, Participants, and Regulators

FTC, June 9, 2015.
Agenda here.
Video of Part 4 here.
Public submissions here. 

Avis concernant un projet de décret et un projet d’arrêté relatifs au transport public particulier de personnes

Autorité de la concurrence, ici.

The Interchange Fees Regulation

Competition policy brief, here. 

Cartel de l'acier: "L’Etat a perdu environ 500 millions d’euros dans cette affaire"

Challenges.fr, ici. 

Loi Macron : des députés ne veulent pas de l’amendement anti-Google

Nextinpact, ici. 

Discussion of "On the Antitrust Economics of the Electronic Books Industry"

Paper here. Discussion here. 

Apple’s plan to rethink pricing formula is overdue

FT.com, here.

Google's European Mea Culpa

Politico.eu, here.

Apple Takes On a Market Full of Streaming Services

NYT, here.

App Maker Files EU Complaint Against Google, Alleging Abuse of Android Dominance

WSJ.com, here.

"Disconnect said Google abused its dominant position in Europe’s mobile market to unfairly discriminate against Disconnect and favor its own privacy and security software. The moves limited Europeans’ access to competing privacy and security software, while letting Google and others track and collect Android users’ information for advertising, Disconnect said...The app maker alleged Google pulled Disconnect because the software disrupted Google’s tracking and advertising efforts, the source of most of the Internet company’s revenue and profit. In an email included in the complaint, a Play store employee said the app was removed because it prevented other apps from delivering ads....A Google spokesman called Disconnect’s claims “baseless.” Google has allowed more than 200 other privacy apps in the Play store, but blocks any apps that alter other apps’ functionality or remove their way of making money, he added, saying Google applies this policy uniformly, with strong support from Android developers...Google abused its dominance in mobile operating systems and the app market by “tying” its own software and security to those platforms, Disconnect said in its complaint. That gave its services an unfair advantage over Disconnect’s rival software, reducing competition and consumer choice in the market for privacy and security software, the developer said. Google’s removal of the app also illegally discriminated against Disconnect because Google’s own privacy and security software, which it includes by default in its Android operating system, isn't held to the same standards, Disconnect argued."

More about Disconnect here.