“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
The New Yorker, here .
-
Elementary, Meta, here .
-
JRS, here .
-
FEPS, here .
-
L. Hof, here.
-
Politico.eu, here. On the one hand, one has Caffarra, and others like her, insisting that the whole thing is a farce. On the other, there ...