“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
FTC Hearings, Video here .
-
CJEU, here . Judging from the press release, this is a victory on every front. And, this time, quite literally without appeal. Whether EU...
-
Fellows of the European AI & Society Fund, here
-
J. Bryson, here.
-
Ruling here.
-
CMA in the interregnum, here.
-
OECD, here. Tbd today, Trento U.
-
M. Botta, Presentation here . 1. COMPETITION POLICY IN ZERO-PRICE MARKETS UPDATING THE ANALYTICAL TOOLKIT MARCO BOTTA Joint meeting of ...