“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
TechCrunch, here . Idealo selbst hier. Team SCiDA here.
-
Now that the programme has been officially released , I can say a word about Thursday’s panel, where I shall present a paper that is highly ...
-
Ja? Nein? Antwort hier .
-
TheEdgeSingapore, here .
-
Rebalance Now, here .
-
Article 19, here . Indeed, here .