“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
CERRE, here. Economists...
-
Seroundtable, here. Sounds familiar? In the Android Auto case, same excuses: we'd love to, but no time and no money...
-
Podcast here. Jobs for everyone! Innovation aplenty! And don't ask me about AI Overviews...
-
C. Doctorow, here . It was called "America First Antitrust" RIP, you won't be missed.
-
Here. Video here .
-
Tech Policy Press, here .
-
M. Kirkwood, here .