“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
-
Introduction (without footnotes) Whenever the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA) is discussed, innovation is invariably at the forefront, ...
-
Centre for a Digital Society , Video here . These are my very rough talking points on pay or okay in full length (more than I actually had...
-
Y Combinator, video here. How is the Ferguson FTC going to tackle Big Tech? Simonetta Vezzoso @wavesblog.bsky.social · 4h Little Tec...
-
WSJ, here . "Trump hasn’t yet decided whether the administration will settle with the company over accusations that it bought Instagra...
-
F. Castillo de la Torre, here .
-
Livestream here.
-
US Senate, Here .
-
LG Frankfurt am Main, 2-06 O 172/09 (verkündet am 13.05.2009). Lesenswertes aus der Begründung (meine Hervorhebungen): "Vorstellbare ...
-
NCLAT, here .
-
C. Reggiani et al., here (but please be aware that the Toulouse School gets generous funding by Big Tech as well).