“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
The Decoder, here. It is not that German judges invariably get it right — the dreadful Meta decision rather proves the point. Yet, as I re...
-
C. Radsch, here.
-
European.Social, here .
-
EuroStack, here .
-
D. Chisnall, here .
-
Apple, here. Relax and comply, says the EC here.
-
Google's own words about the opacity of the ecosystem, here.
-
Jon Stewart's Weekly Show, here.
-
OMI, here .