“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
R. Podszun, F. Scott Morton, here. I agree that more should be done in trying to make102 somewhat functional, but we aren't done with ...
-
Summary of DMA Review consultation, here. Submissions, here.
-
Euractiv, here. While some influential US/EU academics want us to largely forget the DMA and go back to a revised 102 😔.
-
TechPolicyPress, here. Good job, but I wouldn't call it controversy TBH.
-
Donotpassgo.ca, here.
-
Course Description Competition policy has long been regarded as an essential framework for any economy based on market exchange. Its logic...
-
Here. "No settled view" in the UK (ongoing research?) - you can't be more diplomatic than that.
-
Pressemeldung, hier .
-
E. Morozov, hier .