“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
-
We are only a few days on from the Berlin summit on European Digital Sovereignty, where the DMA was celebrated as an essential component to... -
25/11/2025 ACGM, here . [I wrote a blog post on this proceeding what feels like very long ago, here ] "Meta’s new conduct appears t... -
Xmas present to Judge Mehta? For your desk? FT, here . -
NYT, here .
-
Video here .
-
The Diary of a CEO, here. If you listen carefully to Tristan Harris, it becomes crystal clear why the usual suspects are so opposed to the...
-
OECD, here. Tbd today, Trento U.
-
BBC, here . I have listened to the whole thing, and the Q&A was, I suspect, the part I appreciated most. The "straight out of Sil...
-
Pro Market. here.