“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
-
From the DMA Team, on the only platform (US, ça va sans dire) they really feel at ease, apparently: here. My answer to the riddle: "E...
-
Disclosure : for 7 months covering Maria Luisa (Isa) Stasi’s leave, I had the honour of working with Article 19 and contributed to a civil s...
-
Video here . Thank you for asking, Robin. This is my short answer but happy to discuss it further. Concerning the very few words I loved ...
-
EDPS, Video here. I’ve watched almost all of it, but in terms of substance it was rather thin. Von der Leyen I's data economy strate...
-
On 24 March 2004 the European Commission fined Microsoft for abuse of dominant position (H/T Lewis Crofts). 18 years (age of maturity) l...
-
OnFabric here.
-
NLR, here.