“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
Video here . [🙋 was the online Q on GenAI - thank you for the answer!]
-
SCiDA Podcast, here. Code shouldn't be law.
-
P. Ibáñez Colomo, here. Who would've thought ;-)( here ) ?
-
L. Kiesling, here.
-
M. Stucke, here .
-
Reuters, here. A topic for the next DMA High Level Group too?
-
CEPR, here . Why they haven't matched him with a 'formal economist' or two dealing with innovation/knowledge for real (such as...