“Apple presented the intellectual property view of innovation — we created it, we own it, you can’t use it. Samsung presented the competition view of innovation — everyone should make great products and let consumers choose. IP law generally sides with Apple at this broad level, though there is a pretty good argument that it is competition, not monopoly, that drives great innovation in the IT space”, from Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial, Allthingsd.com, here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
-
Dezent... Hier . Schnelle 2 cents: Das LG übersieht mMn dass „eigenes Produkt“ im Kontext von generativer Suche funktional verstanden werd...
-
CPI, here. Complaint here.
-
Here.
-
MacRumors, here. Voilà here.
-
FOSDEM 2026, here .
-
WinBuzzer, here.
-
M. Botta, Presentation here . 1. COMPETITION POLICY IN ZERO-PRICE MARKETS UPDATING THE ANALYTICAL TOOLKIT MARCO BOTTA Joint meeting of ...