Here.
From the Oracle-Sun merger decision, para 182:
"Although, with the exception of points 1, 2 and 3 (see below paragraph 184), Oracle's
public announcement is not legally binding on Oracle, the Commission considers that
the strong specificities of open source software and the vibrant ecosystem surrounding
MySQL provide for a self-enforcing mechanism ensuring that Oracle would not have
the ability and incentives to deviate from its announced future conduct. Reputation and
trust is of utmost importance for the sponsor of an open source project which depends
on contributions by a large ecosystem of users, developers and customers. After the
merger Oracle will become the sponsor of a number of significant open source projects
of Sun, including Java, MySQL and OpenSolaris, and will as such need to gain and
retain the trust from the open source community. In this respect, it can be expected that
all of the public pledges made by Oracle to reassure MySQL users, developers and
storage engine vendors will be subject to close scrutiny from the open source
community."
Was the EU Commission somehow slightly too optimistic?
-
.png)
EC, here . [NotebookLM's own DeepDive here , just for fun] In our Article 19 Report we discussed this and how it could eventually trans... -
In the US, here . I posed the question this morning and received an answer within 30 minutes. That was efficient, thank you!
-
Here. Comments are all ❤️❤️❤️ for her, nice to see! A class apart as antitrust enforcer.
-
Here.
-
Here .
-
E.Klein, here.
-
Here . [I watched it all, pretty weird - the journalist was amazing]
-
Here . We've been playing ourselves with the idea of a DMA Lab for more than a year...Competition! [We didn't hear about Panelis...
No comments:
Post a Comment