Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-467/08 Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE) v PADAWAN S.L., from the press release: "Where a Member State, such as Spain, opts for a system of compensation in the form of a levy on digital reproduction equipment, devices and media, such a charge can be regarded as a compensation scheme for private copying which is compatible with the directive only where it may be presumed that those equipment, devices and media are to be used for making private copies. Remuneration which is granted to rightholders as a result of the indiscriminate application of such a levy to undertakings and professional persons, who from experience purchase digital reproduction devices and media for purposes other than private use, is not ‘fair compensation’ within the meaning of the directive".
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
EC, here . Amer here .
-
Antitrust Digest, here (remember that Ascola 2020 presentation?).
-
NWZOnline, hier.
-
A19, OMI, livestream here.
-
J. Mendelsohn, hier. NotebookLM-generated easy intro here .
-
Guardian, here.
-
Die Medienanstalten, hier.
-
DMA Complaint by A19 and GFF, here.
No comments:
Post a Comment