Video here.
Pre-print Paper here (advance article published by JECLAP on the day she died, here)
2023 Presentation at the "Professorentagung" hier (Hintergrundpapier des Bundeskartellamtes hier)
France Culture, Podcast ici.
J. Kwoka and Tommaso, here.
P. Bougette & Friends, herehere.
Norton Rose Fulbright, here.
G. Colangelo, A. Ribera Martínez, herehere.
T. Schrepel, J. Potts, here.
S. Sophus Lai, S. Flensburg, here.
S. MacMahon Baldwin, here.
V. Robertson, J. Fleiss, here.
Panel moderated by R. Picker (I don't often agree with him, but always learn something), Video here.
Please let me know if you have any feedback, here (soon on Arxiv).
Recordings:
Day 1 here.
Day 2 here.
(Study mentioned during the "Level Playing Field in Accessing Vehicle Data?" here, BTW).
Day 3 here.
Second time that I participate in person, the other 4 editions I followed online (and I hereby gratefully acknowledge that I normally use the summit's recordings also as teaching material for my courses).
This time I participated in a transatlantic panel on antitrust (as a humble researcher and observer, I didn't have perhaps tons to say - apart from talking of saffron risotto - but the other two Panelists did - worth watching for their comments and the excellent questions by Samuel Stolton). But I also had a fun dual role as a moderator of a truly insightful DMA panel (first time I moderated a panel - and it showed - but, luckily, my great Panelists didn't need me at all!).Day one, video here.
How Much Does Antitrust Enforcement Affect Productivity Growth? (8:23)Day two, video here.
Regulatory Competition, the DMA and Innovation (14:05)Economicliberties.us, here.
D. Acemoglu, Video here.
Amsterdam Law School, here.
R. Lande, J. Newman, R. Kelly Slaughter, here.
Natasha The Great and I. Mehta, here.
ITIF (supported by all DMA gategeepers but Bytedance - as well as Boeing, the national champion), video will be here.
Notate Bene: written before the DOJ v. Apple Complaint was filed ;-).
BTW: CC blocked me on X because she finds me and/or my views annoying. No hard feelings, her views will always be welcome on this blog!
California Law Revision Committee, Here.
Osaka Symposium, Presentations here.
Open access book with many goodies, here.
18 March : Apple
19 March : Meta
20 March : AmazonVideo here.
NB: None of the academic economists mentioned that they worked for consultancies - eg Richard Gilbert for Compass Lexecon.
Interesting to see Hans Zeng (EC) there too.
Who’s financing the whole initiative isn’t mentioned on the website. I guess no private donors then (?). The “other” dynamic competition initiative hosted in Florence is instead openly financed (also) by a consultancy.
O. Guersent, here.
The article has ruffled some feathers, while others of a similar tone have passed unnoticed. It is true, as BEUC writes, the "EU’s guiding principle has been to uphold a competition enforcement standard based on broader values including consumer choice, innovation and quality rather than simply price". However, it must also be acknowledged that in the EU the more economic approach with a very strong "industrial organization flavour" and its laser focus on prices and models (along with the array of consultancies it brings along) remains fairly dominant and has not been directly challenged from a theoretical standpoint as is happening in the US.A. Stöhr & J. Mendelsohn, hier.