O. Guersent, here.
The article has ruffled some feathers, while others of a similar tone have passed unnoticed. It is true, as BEUC writes, the "EU’s guiding principle has been to uphold a competition enforcement standard based on broader values including consumer choice, innovation and quality rather than simply price". However, it must also be acknowledged that in the EU the more economic approach with a very strong "industrial organization flavour" and its laser focus on prices and models (along with the array of consultancies it brings along) remains fairly dominant and has not been directly challenged from a theoretical standpoint as is happening in the US.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
The DSA delivers, the DSA delivers not Sitting in a city park, looking at an impressive number of daisies, I am finally listening to the ver...
-
P. Girnus, here. I am the Executive Director of an independent AI policy think tank. Independent means we don't take government money....
-
What is particularly encouraging is that he's not someone who has lived exclusively within the competition policy world/bubble, but rath...
-
M. Peitz, here . [Disagree, of course]
-
OECD, here. Tbd today, Trento U.
-
ARD1, here.
-
S. Cohen, T. Davies here . A sort of licence fee ("mechanisms of compensation") is also the result we suggested coming from a ...
-
Japan Fair Trade Commission, here.
-
Hollywood Reporter, here.
No comments:
Post a Comment