From THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PATENT POLICY REFORM IN THE UNITED STATES: "For the federal antitrust agencies, the extension of patent monopolies in time through profuse improvement patenting and their extension in scope through restrictive cross-licensing agreements pose important enforcement problems. Here too, the problem is in part one of education. Those who manage the antitrust agencies need to learn that there are important barriers to rapid imitation, enhancing incentives for innovation, other than the patent system, so maximization of monopoly rewards associated with patent holdings is unlikely to maximize economic welfare. These agencies need to learn that extension of patent monopolies over time and in scope is more likely to suppress than stimulate innovation. and insisting that drug production be opened up for generic competition once basic patents have expired, leaving however the right to produce validly patented improvement molecules exclusively in the hands of the original drug developer (or any other firm that patents and tests improved variants)"
Friday, August 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Here .
-
Google has announced that it is launching AI Overviews and AI Mode (together with other Gemini-based services) in France. While traditional ...
-
EC, here . "The Commission also takes note of Google's proposals on how it plans to apply the principles of the decision to AI O...
-
S. Salop, here. From what I have seen, this "modern" economic analysis certainly moves beyond a narrow focus on price. It takes ...
-
Reuters, here . Too little, too late?
-
ArsTechnica, here.
-
Pax Silica is presented by the US State Department as its flagship initiative on AI and supply-chain security; the FT reports the EU, Ger...
No comments:
Post a Comment