From THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PATENT POLICY REFORM IN THE UNITED STATES: "For the federal antitrust agencies, the extension of patent monopolies in time through profuse improvement patenting and their extension in scope through restrictive cross-licensing agreements pose important enforcement problems. Here too, the problem is in part one of education. Those who manage the antitrust agencies need to learn that there are important barriers to rapid imitation, enhancing incentives for innovation, other than the patent system, so maximization of monopoly rewards associated with patent holdings is unlikely to maximize economic welfare. These agencies need to learn that extension of patent monopolies over time and in scope is more likely to suppress than stimulate innovation. and insisting that drug production be opened up for generic competition once basic patents have expired, leaving however the right to produce validly patented improvement molecules exclusively in the hands of the original drug developer (or any other firm that patents and tests improved variants)"
Friday, August 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
J. Ryan, here .
-
A. Bradford, A. Chilton, and K. Linos, here .
-
Bloomberg, here.
-
PerkinsCoie, here.
-
C. Pattison et al., here.
-
FE, here. That was soon after South Korea's decision to dump its DMA too. Big Tech in Asia is likely celebrating, with Trump's sup...
-
DuckDuckGo, here.
-
ARD, Tagesschau hier.
-
An Indian undertaking filed an antitrust case against Google 15 y. ago and the case is still ongoingFrom this interesting India ASCOLA webinar, hopefully recording available soon. Why was their DMA "frozen"?
No comments:
Post a Comment