From John Vickers, Competition Policy and Property Rights, p.23
"The European Microsoft judgment has therefore left unclear when a dominant firm with IP rights must share them with rivals. Following the judgment, the answer in Europe appears to be: by no means as exceptionally as previously thought. In some ways it is regrettable that Microsoft did not appeal to the European Court of Justice, which might usefully have clarified if not tightened the law".
Friday, June 26, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
AI generated - don't trust it ;-) S. Vezzoso, ORDO 2026. Abstract : This paper examines the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA) through the le...
-
Euractiv, here. How are they going to coordinate with the Italian proceeding? Looking forward to interim measures! Of course, also the DMA...
-
Today in our Trento classroom the discussion turns to merger control. The timing is well suited, as Brussels today is holding a workshop on...
-
Final Report, for the EC, here . Where you read: "Public initiatives such as Common European Data Spaces and GAIA-X are widely antici...
-
Douze points go to. .. [CADE's contribution to the proposals of regulation of the AI systems, under analysis by the Brazilian Congre...
-
B. Sanders, here.
-
Google, here . During the A19 Conference, we discussed why there wasn't any ongoing DMA qualitative designation for the third hypesca...
No comments:
Post a Comment