From John Vickers, Competition Policy and Property Rights, p.23
"The European Microsoft judgment has therefore left unclear when a dominant firm with IP rights must share them with rivals. Following the judgment, the answer in Europe appears to be: by no means as exceptionally as previously thought. In some ways it is regrettable that Microsoft did not appeal to the European Court of Justice, which might usefully have clarified if not tightened the law".
Friday, June 26, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Here. "No settled view" in the UK (ongoing research?) - you can't be more diplomatic than that.
-
Video here . Good format? Unsure! They allocated most of the available time to a presentation delivered by a US company (dialogue with ...
-
R. Podszun, F. Scott Morton, here. I agree that more should be done in trying to make102 somewhat functional, but we aren't done with ...
-
M. Kirkwood, here . [If teaching at an Italian University counts as European Antitrust Activity, activity, 2025 was the first year I reall...
-
Our Curious Amalgam, here .
-
Bloomberg, here .
-
Course Description Competition policy has long been regarded as an essential framework for any economy based on market exchange. Its logic...
-
On 24 March 2004 the European Commission fined Microsoft for abuse of dominant position (H/T Lewis Crofts). 18 years (age of maturity) l...
No comments:
Post a Comment