Friday, February 08, 2008
At the intersection between copyright and trademark law: Federal Court of Australia on Polo/Lauren's embroidered polo player logo
It would seem rather obvious that firms should not be entitled to control the market for their products "only" by devising a label or a package in which copyright will subsist. This principle has been clearly spelled out by the Federal Court of Australia in The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Ziliani Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 49 (5 February 2008). The issue involved an injunction to restrain importation and sale of clothing bearing embroidered polo player logo without licence of the owner of copyright, whereas the logo was lawfully embroidered in country of manufacture with licence of owner of copyright. The Court ruled, relying on s 44C Copyright Act (socalled exception of a non-infringing accessory) that the the importer is entitled to engage in parallel importing of those goods into Australia. In particular, the embroidered polo player logo was not primarily a decorative feature, but "a symbol to convey that the clothing was made by the Ralph Lauren design or fashion house. It is a ‘signature’ or label conveying that information of the garment’s provenance" in the meaning of subsection 10(1) Copyright Act.
-
Not a dead parrot. Webinar , 1 July, 15-17 CET. Register here if you want to pose questions, otherwise live on YouTube here . This webin...
-
Don't look for it in Rome... Nearly two months on, the Commission’s DMA non-compliance decision against Meta was finally published...
-
ArsTechnica, here . Picture chosen by ArsTechnica for the article. This picture suddenly recalled a Ted Talk I gave 12 years ago touching...
-
CEPS Video here. ---- Here's the EP Report; here's where the Greens would go further. Kick-off conference (24th Sep 2024) he...
-
Belganewsagency, here.
-
K. Tyagi, here.
-
IGF 2025, here.
-
Webinar, 1 July, 15-17 CET. Register here if you want to pose questions, otherwise live on YouTube here . Together with Isa Stasi and Ia...