Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Tenth year anniversary of the International Competition Policy Advisory Committee (ICPAC) Report
Brown Bag Teleconference, ICPAC at Ten and the ICN, ABA.
Monday, June 07, 2010
Friday, June 04, 2010
Swedish Competition Authority: Ex-Post Agency Effectiveness Evaluation
Dan Sjöblom and Arvid Fredenberg. See also London Economics' Evaluation of OFT Competition Advocacy
Thursday, June 03, 2010
Trento's "Festival of Economics"
This year's topic: "Information, Choices and Development".
My personal choice from the extremely rich programme: M. Boldrin and D.K.Levine,
Wednesday, June 02, 2010
Remedies in the EU Microsoft Case
A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF REMEDIES IN THE E.U. MICROSOFT CASES, Nicholas Economides, Ioannis Lianos.
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
WIPO SCCR/19: the draft report is out
Here. Looking ahead for SCCR/20. Read also Key's post on WIPO SCCR open ended consultation on the treaty for the blind
Reflecting on the best antitrust regime: a view from the US
Rewriting History: Antitrust Not As We Know It . . . Yet, J. Thomas Rosch
Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Apple's App Store and GPL
The Free Software Foundation was alleging non-compliance with sec. 6 GPL v.2. Apple reacted by removing the product from its store.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Revised competition rules for motor vehicle distribution and repair in the EU
Commission Regulation (EU) 461/2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector. See also the press release.
On the United/Continental Airlines Merger
The United/Continental Airlines Merger: How Will Consumers Fare?, Darren Bush, before the
US Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommmittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer
Rights.
Discussing the Goals of Competition Law
The 5th ASCOLA Conference “Goals of Competition Law”, May 27-29, 2010
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Bonn, Germany.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Friday, May 21, 2010
Intellectual Property Regimes in a Global Context
Winston Tabb (convener), Nancy Weiss and Michael Geist, Proceedings of the 156th Association of Research Libraries Membership Meeting.
Joaquin Almunia on the first European Commission Cartel Settlement
Read the transcript of his (short) speech. See also OECD, EXPERIENCE WITH DIRECT SETTLEMENTS IN CARTEL CASES, 2009.
Thursday, May 20, 2010
On Banks and Competition Policy
St Gallen International Competition Forum, ‘Too big to fail, but not too big to be unbundled’, Peter Freeman, UK Competition Commission's Chairman.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Jane Ginsburg on Mandatory Copyright Formalities
The U.S. Experience with Mandatory Copyright Formalities: A Love/Hate Relationship, 33 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 311 (2010), p. 311.
DRAM producers fined € 331 million for price cartel
Press release. It is also the first settlement decision adopted by the European Commission according to Articles 7 and 23 of Regulation 1/2003 (Q&A) .
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Filmmakers and the use of fair dealing in Canada
See the new guide released by the Documentary Organization of Canada.
Strategies for opening up content
See this special issue of Research Library Issues (RLI), Association of Research Libraries.
Monday, May 17, 2010
On Behavioral Economics and Antitrust
Behavioral Antitrust, A. P. Reeves, M. E. Stucke. See also OFT's What does Behavioural Economics mean for Competition Policy?
Friday, May 14, 2010
DRM in motion
A motion infographic project about Digital Rights Management (DRM), Vancouver Film School.
EPO on computer-implemented inventions
Opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of 12 May 2010, European Patent Office (here some background info; see also the amicus curiae brief of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure). See here the list of all amicus curiae briefs.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
India-EU Broad-based Trade and Investment Agreement - IPR Chapter
S. the Preliminary Consultation Draft reflecting interesting divergences.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
On the concept of ‘fair compensation’ in the InfoSoc directive
Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-467/08 Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE) v PADAWAN S.L., from the press release: "Where a Member State, such as Spain, opts for a system of compensation in the form of a levy on digital reproduction equipment, devices and media, such a charge can be regarded as a compensation scheme for private copying which is compatible with the directive only where it may be presumed that those equipment, devices and media are to be used for making private copies. Remuneration which is granted to rightholders as a result of the indiscriminate application of such a levy to undertakings and professional persons, who from experience purchase digital reproduction devices and media for purposes other than private use, is not ‘fair compensation’ within the meaning of the directive".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
A. Zerdiashvili, here .
-
V. Robertson, J. Fleiss, here .
-
Axios, here .
-
C. Caffarra, here .
-
N. Shaxson, here.
-
M. Mazzucato, F. Gernone, here (and here ).
-
Please let me know if you have any feedback, here (soon on Arxiv).
-
TechCrunch, here .