Monday, December 09, 2013

Stiglitz to TPP Negotiators

Letter, here

Memo For Sr. Almunia, A Patent Assertion Entity Is Not Necessarily A Patent Troll

Forbes.com, here

France's sovereign patent fund takes aim at LG and HTC in the US and Germany

Iam-magazine.com, here

Turning Government Data into Gold': The Interface between EU Competition Law and the Public Sector Information Directive – With some Comments on the Compass-Case

B. Lundqvist, here or here.

Maverick: Making Sense of a Conjecture of Antitrust Policy in the Lab

C. Engel, A. Ockenfels, here

Some brief comments on SEPs and Art.102 TFEU (Moscow Conference)

This blog's Author, here

Cartel Fines imposed by the EU Commission - Statistics

Ec.europa.eu, here

Intellectual property and competition policy

J. Almunia, here. Important update on (too?) many open issues: SEP, patent trolls, Google Search, etc.

Seminario sobre Propiedad Intelectual: Google and the World Brain

Uoc.edu, aquì

Global Patent Filings See Fastest Growth in 18 Year

WIPO, here. 2012 World Intellectual Property Indicators Report, here

UK Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit goes global in its pursuit of illegal websites

Cityoflondon.police.uk, here

The European Union Public Licence (EUPL)

P.-E. Schmitz, here

Protection Of Handicrafts Gains Global Interest; Challenges Persist In The South

Ip-watch.org, here

Open Innovation 2.0 – A New Paradigm

EU Open Innovation Strategy and Policy Group (OISPG), here. Presentations here. Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2013 here.

Second release of secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement document

Wikileaks.org, here

Sunday, December 08, 2013

Study on business models for Linked Open Government Data

Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) Programme of the European Commission, here

Thursday, December 05, 2013

On the relation between surveillance practices in the EU and the US and the EU data protection provisions

C. Moraes, J. Albrecht, here.

House of Representatives passes widely supported bill to fight patent trolls

TheVerge.com, here.

The Holy See on the TPP


Statement, 9th Session of the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization
Bali, here (p.4-5).

Complexities evident in today's oral argument in Oracle v. Google (API and copyright)

J. Band, here. See also my take on the District Court's ruling in a comparative perspective, here

Public Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules

Here.Press Release, here.

Some highlights:

"The principle of EU exhaustion of the distribution right applies in the case of the distribution of physical copies (e.g. when a tangible article such as a CD or a book, etc. is sold, the right holder cannot prevent the further distribution of that tangible article). The issue that arises here is whether this principle can also be applied in the case of an act of transmission equivalent in its effect to distribution (i.e. where the buyer acquires the property of the copy). This raises difficult questions, notably relating to the practical application of such an approach (how to avoid re-sellers keeping and using a copy of a work after they have “re-sold” it – this is often referred to as the “forward and delete” question {The UsedSoft ruling had an answer to that} as well as to the economic implications of the creation of a second-hand market of copies of perfect quality that never deteriorate (in contrast to the second-hand market for physical goods) {also, technical solutions possible?}


Finally, the question of flexibility and adaptability is being raised: what is the best mechanism to ensure that the EU and Member States’ regulatory frameworks adapt when necessary (either to clarify that certain uses are covered by an exception or to confirm that for certain uses the authorisation of rightholders is required)? The main question here is whether a greater degree of flexibility can be introduced in the EU and Member States regulatory framework while ensuring the required legal certainty, including for the functioning of the Single Market, and respecting the EU's international obligations. {pretty straightforward answer: yes, on all accounts}.

Teaching (exception)
Some argue that the law should provide for better possibilities for distance learning and study at home {indeed: my longish take here, Italian only}.

Marrakesh Treaty
The EU and its Member States have started work to sign and ratify the Treaty {how far advanced are they, really? }This may require the adoption of certain provisions at EU level (e.g. to ensure the possibility to exchange accessible format copies across borders). 

A specific Working Group was set up on this issue in the framework of the "Licences for Europe" stakeholder dialogue. No consensus was reached among participating stakeholders on either the problems to be addressed or the results. At the same time, practical solutions to facilitate text and data mining of subscription-based scientific content were presented by publishers as an outcome of “Licences for Europe”. In the context of these discussions, other stakeholders argued that no additional licences should be required to mine material to which access has been provided through a subscription agreement and considered that a specific exception for text and data mining should be introduced {following some proposals at State level...Shouldn't it be the other way round?} possibly on the basis of a distinction between commercial and non-commercial. 








Tuesday, December 03, 2013

Henry Ford, Patent Trolling, & the Goodlatte Innovation Act in Cartoon Form

Patentlyo.com, here.

Open Data in Transition: Intellectual Property, Competition, and Regulatory Issues

Thursday 19th December 2013
University of Trento
Venue: Department of Economics and Management
Conference Programme here

Privacy and Facial Recognition Technology

Ntia.doc.gov, here

UK Competition Network (UKCN): Statement of Intent

Here

Digitising copyrighted film, books and music is probably going to become legal - it's about time

Newstatesman.com, here

Five Stages of Data Grief

Open Data Institute, here

Avis sur la situation de la concurrence dans le secteur des autoroutes

Autorité de la Concurrence, ici.

Utiliser les irrépartissables des sociétés de gestion collective pour financer la numérisation du domaine public ?

Scinfolex.com, ici. 

United Kingdom: interim injunctions in competition litigation

Kluwercompetitionlawblog.com, here

New F.C.C. Chief Promises He Will Protect Competition

NYTimes.com, here

LG Berlin: Urteil vzbv vs. Google im Volltext

Legalmemory.blogspot.com, hier.

Monday, December 02, 2013

Indistinguishable from Magic: A Wizard's Guide to Copyright and 3D Printing

J. Grimmelmann, here.

EU-Ministerrat: Deutsche Beamte bremsen Europas Datenschutz aus

Spiegel.de, hier

Internetvertrieb und vertikale Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen

G. Kallfaß, hier

Could Digital College Textbooks Become Free in the USA?

Publishingperspectives.com, here

Fair use, Georgia State, and the rest of the world

Blogs.library.duke.edu, here

How a 2-page letter led to American Airlines' antitrust settlement with the feds

Dallasnews.com, here

Drug detectives: scientists want to crowdsource the discovery of new antibiotics

TheVerge.com, here

La CNMC multa con 15 millones de euros a Mediapro y a cuatro clubs de fútbol

CNMC.es, aquì

Ending the Book Famine: How Does the WIPO Treaty Help?

S. King, Presentation here

When Algorithms Grow Accustomed to Your Face

NYTimes.com, here

Startup Cities To Become Reality (ZEDE - Zonas de Empleo y Desarrollo Económico)

EdanYago.me, here

Open Government Guide

The Transparency and Accountability Initiative, here

Thanks for the tip, I’ll get it on Amazon

Macleans.ca, here

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Google Books: Eight Years Later...

Publishersweekly, here

Bundeskartellamt erwirkt Änderung des Händler-Rabattsystems bei GARDENA

Bundeskartellamt.de, hier

Competition Policy for Modern Banks

L. Ratnovski, here.

Film Producers and Distributors Obtain Site Block from Paris Court

The1709blog.blogspot.co.uk, here

Israeli Publishers and Hebrew University Reach Historic Agreement on Fair Use

ArielKatz.org, here

Rivals can create copycat software through testing developers' software and interpreting their user manuals, rules UK court

Out-law.com, here

Bundesgerichtshof zur Nutzung urheberrechtlich geschützter Werke auf elektronischen Lernplattformen von Universitäten

Urteil vom 28. November 2013 - I ZR 76/12 - Meilensteine der Psychologie, Pressemitteilung hier

Regulatory context of Machine to Machine (M2M)

M. Delecluse, Presentation here

Google’s Growing Patent Stockpile

MIT Technology Review, here

Your medical data in their hands - concerns mount over new NHS IT project

Opendemocracy.net, here

Pour le respect des droits fondamentaux des lecteurs dans un environnement numérique

Association des Bibliothécaires de France, ici

Monday, November 25, 2013

European citizens and Intellectual Property: perception, awareness and behaviour

OHIM, here

The European Commission and Open Access

J.-F. Dechamp, Presentation here, video here

Government of Canada Quietly Changes Its Approach to Crown Copyright

MichaelGeist.ca, here

Competition in Road Fuel

OECD Roundtable, here

Creative Commons to European Commission: No restrictions on PSI re-use

CreativeCommons.org, here

Proposition de loi concernant les stratégies abusives de réappropriation du domaine publique

Actualitte.com, ici

Lobbyarbeit im Datenschutz: Ex-Kommissar auf schräger Mission

Sueddeutsche.de, hier

The Changing Textbook Industry

J. Band, here

A US Court Issues Second Ruling Determining RAND Rate for Standard Essential Patent (Innovatio)

M. Carrier, here

Tracas en perspective pour Google Maps ?

Zdnet.fr, ici

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the LibreOffice project evolved?

J. Gamalielsson, B. Lundell, here.

Brussels to launch antitrust probe into sales of pay-TV rights


Financial Times, here.

"Joaquín Almunia, the EU competition commissioner, last year sanctioned a “fact finding” effort in light of the (Murphy) ruling to see whether barriers to cross-border access merited antitrust scrutiny and possible enforcement action.

Some investigators are now poised to step up their inquiries into whether “absolute territorial protection clauses” break competition law. These stop licensees from selling to other countries or accepting unsolicited demands from overseas customers to pay to access the content.

......

Maurits Dolmans, a partner at Cleary Gottlieb, said the 2011 Premier League case concerned satellite sports broadcasting and the court left open whether it could be applied at all to other distribution channels and other forms of content.

“The Commission will have to take into account different economic factors,” he said. “Forcing EU-wide licensing may be attractive for consumers in richer countries, who may pay less, but not necessarily for consumers in poorer countries, who might be forced to pay more.”

Friday, November 22, 2013

Creative Economy Report 2013

UNESCO, here.

Intellectual Property chapter of TPP poses threat to Open Access

Mysciencework.com, here.

Le policy universitarie in materia di Accesso Aperto alla scienza: l’esperienza dell’Università di Trieste

Seminario, 27 novembre 2013, Università di Trento, qui.

Programma
14.30
Saluti della Rettrice - prof.ssa Daria de Pretis

14.40
Introduzione – prof. Roberto Caso, delegato della Rettrice per l’Open Access e le politiche contro il plagio

15.00
La policy dell’Università di Trieste in materia di accesso aperto – prof. Fabio Benedetti, Presidente della Commissione di Ateneo per l’accesso aperto dell’Università di Trieste

15.30 - 16.00
Dibattito