A Guide For the Perplexed Part IV: The Rejection of the Google Books Settlement

J.Band, here. 

US Libraries on Google Books ASA's Rejection

Here. 

A Digital Library Better Than Google’s

R.Darnton, here. 

Inside Judge Chin's Opinion

J.Grimmelmann, here. 

Estimating the Economic Impact of Mass Digitization Projects on Copyright Holders: Evidence from the Google Book Search Litigation

Hannibal Travis, here.

Google Books as seen from an Italian (librarian) perspective

Antonella De Robbio, 2010 Odissea Google Libri

Google Books Settlement, an Antitrust Perspective

An Introduction to Competition Concerns in the Google Books Settlement, by Rudolph J.R. Peritz and Marc Miller.

Paths Forward for the Google Books Settlement

A Diagram, by Jonathan Band.

Research Libraries on Google Books Settlement

The Google Books Settlement: Second Round Comments

Google Books Revised Settlement and Open Access

From Peter Suber’s December 2009 issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter. See also some comments from Germany's Coalition for Action: Copyright for Education and Research (Aktionsbündnis: Urheberrecht für Bildung und Wissenschaft)

ARL and Others on the Google Books Settlement (Part III)

A Guide for the Perplexed Part III: The Amended Settlement Agreement, by Jonathan Band.

Google Books Settlement Amended

Here. A first overview of the amendments from a German perspective here. Matters concerning Open Access are discussed here, concerning CC licences in particular here, further links to ongoing discussions here.

Google-Books: Tagung in Berlin

Tagung “Enteignung oder Infotopia? Google Books und die Zukunft des Wissens”, Berichterstattung und demnächst Video-Zusammenfassung hier.

Google Book Settlement:Amendment Ahead

See MOTION for Hearing / Notice of Unopposed Motion of the Author Sub-Class and the Publisher Sub-Class to Adjourn October 7, 2009 Final Fairness Hearing and Schedule Status Conference (new deadline: November, 9).

Google Book Settlement: Department of Justice's Statement of Interest

The Department of Justice has expressed serious legal concerns. A comment by Randy Picker.