O. Hathaway and A. Kapczynski, here.
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Monday, August 29, 2011
Friday, August 19, 2011
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Class of indirect purchasers of a generic certified
RE WELLBUTRIN XL ANTITRUST LITIGATION, NO. 08-2433 here.
Assessment of CETA IPR Chapter
Final Report for the EU‐Canada Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) on the EU‐Canada
Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, here, p. 319 ff.
Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, here, p. 319 ff.
Abuse of Dominance in the residential real estate market in India
Competition Commission of India, Belaire Owner's Association vs DLF Limited and HUDA, here.
First sale doctrine and copies manufactured outside the U.S.
John Wiley & Sons v. Kirtsaeng, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, Docket No. 09-4896-cv, here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Monday, August 15, 2011
Friday, August 12, 2011
On the meaning of research in fair dealing under the Canadian Copyright Act
THE FEDERATION OF LAW SOCIETIES OF CANADA and CANADIAN LEGAL
INFORMATION INSTITUTE/INSTITUT CANADIEN D’INFORMATION JURIDIQUE, Interveners, SOCAN v. Bell et al., here.
INFORMATION INSTITUTE/INSTITUT CANADIEN D’INFORMATION JURIDIQUE, Interveners, SOCAN v. Bell et al., here.
L’Oréal v. eBay: The Court of Justice of the European Union Tightens Liability of Online Marketplace Operators
I. Bhattacharya, G. Wunsch, M. Saarinen, L. Cohen, here.
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Tuesday, August 09, 2011
Monday, August 08, 2011
Friday, August 05, 2011
Thursday, August 04, 2011
Perfect 10 Legal Saga: Court of Appeals on the request for preliminary injunctive relief
PERFECT 10, INC., v. GOOGLE, INC., here (from SCRIBD)
Wednesday, August 03, 2011
Tuesday, August 02, 2011
THE ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT ( ACTA): AN ASSESSMENT
Study requested by the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade, here.
Flash Cookies and Privacy II: Now with HTML5 and ETag Respawning
M. Ayenson, D. Wambach, A. Soltani, N. Good, C. Hoofnagle, here.
Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Tuesday, July 05, 2011
Australia’s approach to expert evidence in competition law cases
The Hot Tub, Video released by the University of Melbourne Competition Law & Economics Network (CLEN), here.
Monday, July 04, 2011
ECJ on public lending and the amount of remuneration
Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat, Case C‑271/10, 30 June 2011, here.
Friday, July 01, 2011
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
BGH: Kartellteilnehmer haften auch mittelbar Geschädigten auf Schadensersatz
Urteil des Kartellsenats vom 28.6.2011 - KZR 75/10, Pressemitteilung.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
SCCR 22: Conclusions
Here. On Limitations and Exceptions, Persons with print and other reading disabilities:
"(....)
4. Following further discussion, the Committee asked the Chair to prepare a Chair’s text for an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities (document SCCR/22/16), which would constitute the basis for the future text-based work to be undertaken by the Committee in its 23rd session.
5. The Committee agreed to recommend to the WIPO General Assembly that Members of the Committee continue discussions regarding the Chair’s document SCCR/22/16 with the aim to agree and finalize a proposal on an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities in the 23rd session of the SCCR, in accordance with the timetable adopted at the 21st session of the SCCR.
6. The Committee encouraged the stakeholders to continue the work of the
Stakeholders’ Platform."
5. The Committee agreed to recommend to the WIPO General Assembly that Members of the Committee continue discussions regarding the Chair’s document SCCR/22/16 with the aim to agree and finalize a proposal on an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities in the 23rd session of the SCCR, in accordance with the timetable adopted at the 21st session of the SCCR.
6. The Committee encouraged the stakeholders to continue the work of the
Stakeholders’ Platform."
Optimierte Verantwortung/slosigkeit - Wer verantwortet eigentlich was in unserer „smarten Welt?“
T. Weichert, Hintergrundtext für die Sommerakademie des Unabhängigen Landeszentrums für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein, hier.
Monday, June 27, 2011
United States Response to Questionnaire Concerning Boundaries and Interfaces With Respect to Copyright and Related Rights
ALAI 2011 Dublin. By J. Besek, J. Ginsburg, L. Helman, P. Loengard, E. Subotnik and E. Bensoul, here. Read also the answers provided in relation to the situation in the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and Finland.
Federal appellate court on the "hot news" doctrine
BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. et al. v THEFLYONTHEWALL.COM, INC., Docket No. 10-1372-cv, here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
J. Gans, here .
-
Ofcom, here .
-
The American Prospect, here .
-
J. Stiglitz, here .